Tag: Iraq

  • A Return to Tradition? Iraq Legalizes Child Marriages

    A Return to Tradition? Iraq Legalizes Child Marriages

    Iraq, a parliamentary republic in the Middle East, has long distinguished itself from theocratic regimes like Iran or Afghanistan, where strict Sharia laws and conservative Islamic customs dominate. Unlike these nations, Iraq’s multi-ethnic society encompasses diverse beliefs and traditions, reflected in its post-2005 constitutional framework that allows political parties and communities a degree of autonomy to interpret and practice their customs, even if not directly restricted by federal laws.

    One of the most contentious issues in the Islamic world—child marriage—has now entered the spotlight in Iraq. While the country’s official legal framework sets the marriage age at 18, adopting principles rooted in modern Egyptian law influenced by French legal traditions, many communities have continued to practice child marriage. These informal practices are now being formally legitimized under the influence of the Sadrist Movement, an Iraqi Shi’a Islamic nationalist political force led by Muqtada al-Sadr.

    With the government’s decision to legalize child marriages, Iraq appears to be moving closer to adopting a model resembling that of Iran’s Islamic Republic, where traditional and religious codes overshadow modern legal frameworks. This shift raises concerns about Iraq’s trajectory, signaling a potential alignment with stricter interpretations of Sharia law and marking a significant transformation in its societal and political fabric.

    Although Iraq has prohibited marriage for those under 18 since the 1950s, with judicial approval required for those aged 15 to 17, a UN survey found that 28% of girls in Iraq are married before adulthood. Many girls are either coerced or pressured into marriage, often dropping out of school to do so.

    Instead of strengthening laws to prevent underage marriage or providing support for girls from disadvantaged backgrounds to finish their education, recent amendments to Iraq’s Personal Status Law could have the opposite effect. The new law, passed by parliament, would allow girls as young as nine to marry and shift authority over family matters—including marriage, divorce, and child custody—to religious bodies. Critics argue that these amendments effectively legalize child marriage, deepening concerns about the protection of girls’ rights in Iraq.

    The amendments have sparked widespread outrage among Iraqi MPs and women’s rights advocates, who argue that the law represents a significant setback. Many warn that it effectively legitimizes child exploitation, with activists condemning it as “Legalizing Child Rape.” This controversial shift has drawn intense criticism, with concerns that it will undermine the rights and futures of young girls in Iraq. Critics—including activists and opposing lawmakers—caution that, if enacted, the changes would likely lead to a rise in underage marriages, further jeopardizing the well-being and opportunities of young girls throughout the country.

    Activists argue that the push to legalize child marriage is a calculated attack on women’s rights and freedoms, driven by the prominent role young women played in Iraq’s 2019 anti-government protests. The mass demonstrations, primarily led by youth, emphasized the growing empowerment of women in Iraqi society. In the aftermath, political and religious factions viewed feminist movements, women’s organizations, and activist networks as direct challenges to their power and authority. As a result, these groups were seen as threats, prompting efforts to suppress and restrict them.

    Proponents of the amendments, largely supported by conservative Shia lawmakers, argue that the changes are necessary to align Iraq’s laws with Islamic principles and to shield the country from perceived Western cultural influence. However, critics see this as an attempt to tether Iraq more closely to the Islamic Republic of Iran, which views the West as an adversary and frames its policies as a defense of Islamic values. As Iran’s influence wanes in Syria and Lebanon, Iraq has become a key battleground for asserting regional dominance. By bolstering the Shia government’s control in Iraq, Iran aims to strengthen its grip on the country and pull it further into the fold of the Islamic Republic.

  • Is Iran losing grip on Iraq?

    Is Iran losing grip on Iraq?

    Iraq is in the midst of a power struggle between two power houses: one is their neighbor, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the other is the United States. Both parties are heavily interested in this country, which is divided between Shia, Sunni Muslims, and Kurds, situated in a volatile location in the Middle East. After turbulent years under Saddam Hussein and a subsequent power vacuum, Iraqi politics became heavily influenced by Iran due to the rise of Shia-based political parties. The interests of Shia, Sunni, Iran, and the US  have led to the near disintegration of the state, with the country nearly fragmented and the northern Kurdish territory almost functioning as an independent nation. However, in recent years, it is noted that this Shia-majority country is shifting away from Iran-oriented politics. Many believe that Iraq is drawing closer to the US and distancing itself from Iran.

    Iraq operates as a federal parliamentary representative democratic republic. It follows a multi-party system where executive authority rests with the Prime Minister of the Council of Ministers, serving as the head of government, and the President of Iraq, who serves as the head of state. The Council of Representatives holds legislative power. Abdul Latif Rashid, an ethnic Kurd, currently holds the presidency, wielding significant executive authority. He appointed the Council of Ministers, functioning as the cabinet or government. Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani, a Shia leader, serves as the current prime minister. Despite its democratic framework, Iraq exhibits signs of an increasingly authoritarian regime. But As regional tensions escalate, Washington will enhance its relationship with Iraq and may consider Iraq’s prime minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani as a potential intermediary in its dealings with Iran.

    Both the United States and Iraq find themselves in a period where they need each other. Al-Sudani recently visited Washington, DC, meeting President Joe Biden and other top US officials. From the White House, al-Sudani addressed the regional tensions and expressed his encouragement for all efforts to stop the expansion of the conflict area. Iraqi officials state that their country was among a handful informed by Iran of the attack on Israel, which followed an Israeli strike on the Iranian Embassy in Damascus. For the US, the Iran-Israel clash highlighted the necessity of maintaining US troops in Iraq for the time being and emphasized the need for the Iraqi government to do more to prevent Iraq from being used as a base of operations against the US and Israel by Iran and allied groups. More than 20 years after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 aimed at removing former leader Saddam Hussein, 2,500 US troops are still stationed in the country, primarily undertaking counter-ISIL (ISIS) roles. Amid regional tensions, al-Sudani appears to prioritize Iraq’s domestic issues, and aims to attract investment in the country’s private sector. Iraq’s economy remains highly reliant on the United States and its financial infrastructure. Al-Sudani is advocating for fewer American restrictions on the Iraqi banking system, increased investments, and enhanced security ties.

    Iran-aligned groups, such as the militias that constitute the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI), pose a threat to both Iraq and US troops stationed there, with many expecting them to become the next al-Qaeda. US troops became targets in the aftermath of Israel’s war on Gaza. There is reason to fear Iran-aligned groups in the country remobilizing if regional tensions expand.  Finding a balance between Iran’s influence and US interests is not easy, with al-Sudani pushed to call for a complete withdrawal of US troops in January, seemingly in response to some 53 US attacks on Iran-aligned groups in Iraq. It’s made clear that al-Sudani doesn’t want to provoke enmity with Iran either. However, his warming connection with the US suggests a weakening of Iran’s control over Iraqi politics. Iraq is set to hold elections in 2025, and the prime minister needs the support of his domestic backers as well as the US if he wants to renew his mandate.

    As for the US, Biden will have both domestic and regional concerns regarding Iraq. The Biden administration is seeking to counter Iranian influence in Iraq at a regional level. The US would seek commitments to ensure Iraq’s sovereignty by minimizing Iranian influence across all levels of decision-making, including politics, economics, and security. And the US will aim to persuade al-Sudani to cooperate with US allies in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdish region of northern Iraq. In the last six months, officials from the Kurdish regional government have made several visits to Washington, aiming to enlist the Biden administration’s support in mediating with Baghdad. The Kurdish leaders generally view Sudani favorably and see him as genuine in his efforts to resolve Baghdad-Erbil issues.

    Iraq, one of the oldest places of civilization, has the third richest oil reserve after Saudi Arabia and Iran. However, it’s true that the country has never fully utilized its potential. There are many blames attributed to the United States, who removed Saddam Hussein for his alleged weapons of mass destruction. Iran has also been blamed for pushing its interests and causing political turmoil in the country. Islamist organizations like Al-Qaeda and ISIS also played a role in the destruction of Iraq. There are many parties to blame, but ultimately, the people are the ones who suffer the most, and they witness the failing of their beautiful state. However, recent developments in politics, moving towards a more neutral stance and cooperating with the United States and its wealth, offer hope for improvements in Iraq.