Tag: Malaysia

  • Mahathir’s Shadow: Analyzing the Allegations Against Daim Zainuddin in Malaysia’s Corruption Crackdown

    Mahathir’s Shadow: Analyzing the Allegations Against Daim Zainuddin in Malaysia’s Corruption Crackdown

    In the wake of the Pandora Papers revelation, Malaysia is vigorously conducting multiple high-profile investigations. Despite the government’s stance against corruption, Political analysts highlight the long-standing political rivalry between Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Mahathir Mohammed as the key driving force behind these ongoing probes. The emphasis on Daim Zinuddin, the politician’s closest associate, and Mirzan, Mahathir’s eldest son, underscores the significant impact of this entrenched political feud on the investigations.

    Anwar Ibrahim, Daim Zainuddin, and Mahathir Mohammed were formerly affiliated within the Umno Party. Despite their prior association, Daim sided with Mahathir when Anwar was ousted from his position as deputy prime minister in 1998, leading to Anwar’s incarceration on corruption and sodomy charges during Mahathir’s tenure. The present prime minister and his supporters currently challenge these allegations, asserting their inaccuracy. This has spawned an enduring conflict that continues to influence Malaysian politics.

    Financial information leaked by the Pandora Papers names Daim, his wife Naimah, and their two sons as recipients of US$52.5 million in trust-owned assets, including properties in the US and the UK. Last Thursday, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) declared that investigations, which were started in August 2022, cover every entity mentioned in the Pandora Papers as well as those listed in the 2016 Panama Papers leak. Anti-corruption agents recently took over a building owned by Daim’s family as part of their investigation.

    In response to the MACC investigation, Daim mounted a legal challenge, vehemently denying any wrongdoing and asserting that his wealth was acquired through legitimate business activities predating his entry into politics. His affidavit argued that had he remained solely in business without actively expanding his assets, the value of his liquid stock holdings alone would now surpass 50 billion ringgit (US$10.5 billion). Following his wife’s charges, it is anticipated that Daim will be the next individual to face trial.

    Naimah Abdul Khalid, the spouse of Daim Zainuddin, openly criticized Malaysia’s Prime Minister, Anwar Ibrahim, on Tuesday. Speaking to reporters at the Kuala Lumpur court, Naimah contended that Anwar was using the corruption crackdown as a guise to settle scores with political adversaries. Accused of manipulating the country’s anti-corruption agency and top prosecutor for a political vendetta, she underscored the transient nature of power, cautioning Anwar that those who misuse it will face consequences. Naimah made these statements after being charged with failing to disclose her assets as part of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) investigation into her family’s wealth. Naimah stands as the first individual to face charges in connection with the corruption crackdown.

    Mahathir has also characterized the ongoing investigations as selective persecution, even suggesting that the MACC overlooked allegations from 1999, accusing Anwar of concealing substantial sums in various accounts. In response, the MACC refuted Mahathir’s claims on Wednesday, asserting that a thorough investigation was initiated during his prime ministership, and there is no case against Anwar. 

    The MACC has expanded its investigation to include Mahathir’s eldest son, Mirzan, scrutinizing his involvement in the sale and purchase of government-linked companies and information disclosed in the Panama Papers. Mirzan, aged 66, who possesses stakes in the Philippine energy company Petron and its parent firm San Miguel, has been instructed to disclose his assets to the MACC by mid-February.

    The enduring political feud between Mahathir and Anwar is evidently a significant driving force behind the recent investigations. The Pandora Papers have presented Anwar with an opportunity, and he is strategically leveraging it, whether perceived positively or negatively in the political arena. However, from an anti-corruption perspective, these investigations offer hope for a country grappling with severe corruption.

  • Islet Disputes: Malaysia’s Royal Commission to Examine Singapore Strait Dispute Cases

    Islet Disputes: Malaysia’s Royal Commission to Examine Singapore Strait Dispute Cases

    On Wednesday, the Malaysian cabinet announced the establishment of a royal commission of inquiry to investigate the management of cases related to three disputed islets in the Singapore Strait. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, advocating for a reassessment, has specifically highlighted the 2018 decision made during the administration of then-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. This decision involved Malaysia withdrawing its application to revise an International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that affirmed Singapore’s sovereignty over Pedra Branca, one of the contested islets.

    The protracted disputes between Malaysia and Singapore over small islets concluded with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarding Malaysia the Middle Rocks formation and designating nearby Pedra Branca, also known as Pulau Batu Puteh by Malaysia, to Singapore. In an attempt to overturn the Pedra Branca aspect of the ruling in 2017, Malaysia withdrew its claim a year later during Mahathir’s premiership.

    Last year, Malaysia’s Attorney-General Idris Harun expressed the government’s belief that the 2018 decision to withdraw two ICJ applications regarding the sovereignty of Pedra Branca, Middle Rocks, and South Ledge was “not in order and improper,” without providing further details. Ongoing scrutiny of task force recommendations, including matters related to the “tort of misfeasance in public office” — a form of misconduct by a public official causing harm or loss to a third party — suggests that appropriate actions will align with the Cabinet’s decision.

    According to the Tuesday announcement by Chief Secretary to the Government Mohd Zuki Ali, the approval of the king of Malaysia is required for the cabinet’s decision. The envisioned panel aims to conduct an open, equitable, and unbiased investigation by including specialists with extensive expertise in judicial, legal, and public administration matters.

    Pedra Branca, the easternmost point of Singapore, is an outlying island named for the whitish guano adorning its rock surfaces. With dimensions of approximately 8,560 square meters during low tide, this small granite outcrop extends up to 137 meters in length and maintains an average width of 60 meters. Situated about 14 km off the southern coast of Malaysia and 44 km off the east coast of Singapore, Pedra Branca is characterized by a chain of rocky outcrops.

    Adjacent to Pedra Branca are two maritime features. Middle Rocks, under Malaysia’s sovereignty, comprises two clusters of small rocks located approximately 250 meters apart, situated 1.1 km south of Pedra Branca. South Ledge, positioned 4.1 km to the south-southwest of Pedra Branca, manifests as a rock formation visible only during low tide.

    The issue between Singapore and Malaysia regarding Pedra Branca began on December 21, 1979, when Malaysia published a map asserting the island’s inclusion within its territorial waters. This marked the onset of a over 25-year territorial dispute, encompassing matters of sovereignty over the neighboring maritime features of Middle Rocks and South Ledge. The disputing parties subsequently brought this complex issue before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for resolution.

    On May 23, 2008, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) unequivocally declared Pedra Branca as falling under the sovereignty of Singapore. The ICJ acknowledgment also took note of Singapore’s proposed reclamation plans for Pedra Branca. Despite the island’s initial association with the Johor Sultanate’s sovereignty, both the United Kingdom and Singapore had undertaken acts of sovereignty concerning Pedra Branca. The lack of response from Malaysia and its predecessors to these actions, coupled with other indications recognizing Singapore’s sovereignty, led to the conclusion that Singapore had acquired sovereignty over Pedra Branca.

    In contrast, Middle Rocks retained its status as part of Malaysian territory, given Singapore’s absence of demonstrated acts of sovereignty over it. The ICJ refrained from providing a definitive ruling on South Ledge, specifying that its ownership pertains to the state within whose territorial waters it is located. To address the complex territorial matters surrounding Pedra Branca, Middle Rocks, and South Ledge, Malaysia and Singapore established the Joint Technical Committee. This committee is tasked with delineating the maritime boundary in the Pedra Branca and Middle Rocks area and determining the ownership status of South Ledge.

    In 2017, Malaysia sought to overturn the ICJ ruling concerning Pedra Branca but abandoned its claim a year later during Mahathir’s tenure as prime minister. On February 1, 2019, Pedra Branca was incorporated into East Coast GRC for representation in the Parliament of Singapore.

    Given the profound interdependence and extensive collaboration between the two nations, there will be no escalation with cases. Following the Court’s definitive decision, both Singapore and Malaysia made public declarations of acceptance and commitment to abide by the Court’s ruling. It is evident that the focus of this movement is directed towards Malaysian politics and the government under Mahathir’s leadership. The involvement of Singapore in this context seems unlikely. However, considering China’s expanding presence in the South China Sea and its strategic importance, every rock in the region now holds significance.

  • Malaysian Resolve: Standing Strong in Support of Palestine’s Full Membership

    Malaysian Resolve: Standing Strong in Support of Palestine’s Full Membership

    As a predominantly Muslim nation, Malaysia consistently upholds its unwavering support for Palestine, especially at a time when some Arab countries are reconsidering their stance. Despite wavering support from other Arab nations, Malaysia stands firmly with Palestine and condemns Israel’s attacks on Gaza.

    Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan expressed Malaysia’s aspiration for Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations (UN) and called for a ceasefire during a meeting with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim echoed this sentiment, aligning it with Guterres’ statement at the Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Kampala, Uganda, which affirmed the Palestinians’ right to establish an independent state.

    In a Facebook post, Prime Minister Anwar stressed the importance of restoring rightful rights to deserving individuals, emphasizing that peace relies on ending oppression, violence, and the denial of rights. He cautioned against the proliferation of apartheid policies, foreseeing an insecure future if such injustice persists.

    Anwar Ibrahim restated Malaysia’s stance on principle, reaffirming the Palestinians’ right to an autonomous state based on borders from before 1967, with East Jerusalem serving as its capital. Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan called for responsibility for Israel’s blatant transgressions of international law in Gaza during the UN Security Council Open Debate on The Situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian Question.

    The credibility of international law is undermined and efforts to put an end to Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine are impeded, as Mohamad emphasized, by the absence of accountability for its acts. Malaysia is unwavering in its support of justice and the Palestinian people’s rights.

    Mohamad highlighted Malaysia’s unwavering commitment to upholding international law and defending the rights of the oppressed. He disclosed that Malaysia, in collaboration with 56 other countries, submitted a written statement to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 23, 2023, addressing the legal consequences of Israel’s ongoing violations in Palestinian territory. Additionally, he announced Malaysia’s active participation in the forthcoming public hearing scheduled for February 19.

    Asserting Malaysia’s resolute opposition to any reduction in Palestinian territory, Mohamad argued that such attempts contravene international law and hinder the prospects of peaceful coexistence. He criticized the Security Council’s failure to call for a ceasefire, attributing it to over a hundred days of continuous violence and suffering in Gaza.

    Expressing dismay over Israel’s indiscriminate bombing, targeting homes, shelters, evacuation routes, and medical centers, Mohamad presented alarming statistics on Palestinian casualties. He urged the Security Council to recognize Israel’s actions as genocide and advocated for the acceptance of the State of Palestine as a full member of the United Nations.

    Mohamad called for an immediate ceasefire, condemned the forced displacement of Palestinians, and reaffirmed Malaysia’s commitment to utilizing all available means and rights to end the ongoing injustice and illegality. He urged the international community to prioritize providing essential amenities for the Palestinian people, emphasizing that access to basic services is a fundamental human right that must not be compromised. In conclusion, he condemned Israel’s collective punishment of Gaza’s entire population, branding it as illegal, immoral, and in urgent need of cessation.

    Israel has been carrying out a deadly war on the Gaza Strip since October. At least 24,000 Palestinians (including over 10,000 children) have died, over 60,000 have been injured, and 7,000 are missing under debris, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Since the war started, there have been over 90,000 casualties overall, which represents a sizable portion of Gaza’s 2.3 million population. 

    “The occupation by Israel has to stop. In addition to being unacceptable, Israel’s rejection of the two-state solution in the face of significant international pressure indirectly prolongs the conflict, according to Guterres. He raised doubts about the feasibility of a one-state solution, pointing out that a sizable portion of the Palestinian population would be denied freedom, rights, and dignity in such a system. Guterres reiterated that the only way to satisfy the justifiable hopes of both Israelis and Palestinians is to achieve a two-state solution. 

    For Muslim Majority states, Palestine is a significant issue, symbolizing solidarity within the Islamic world. In democratic Islamic nations like Malaysia, it plays a crucial role in shaping people’s support in elections. Neighboring Indonesia too, exhibiting increased assertiveness on the Palestine issue, garners backing from the Muslim world. Despite close economic ties with Western nations, Despite increased business with the US, Malaysia stands firm in its stance, unwavering in its support for Palestine.

  • Iswaran’s Charge With Corruption and Its Political Echoes

    Iswaran’s Charge With Corruption and Its Political Echoes

    Singapore consistently earns recognition as the least corrupt nation in Asia and ranks among the top ten cleanest globally, according to Transparency International. The World Bank’s governance indicators commend Singapore for its commitment to the rule of law, effective governance, and corruption control. However, the recent legal action against former Transport Minister S Iswaran has sent shockwaves through the country’s political landscape. S Iswaran faces a total of 27 charges, predominantly related to bribery and corruption, involving sums exceeding S$384,300. 

    In the face of charges against S Iswaran, political analysts downplay the likelihood of a substantial impact on the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic plans for leadership transition and the impending General Election (GE). Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is believed to have factored in the potential trial, and even if it exceeds expectations, Iswaran’s resignation as a Member of Parliament (MP) and PAP member is considered a satisfactory resolution to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) inquiry. Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has affirmed to reporters that the leadership transition plan remains unaffected despite Iswaran’s legal challenges. Nonetheless, there are lingering concerns among political observers regarding the void created by Iswaran’s departure from the West Coast Group Representation Constituency (GRC). This raises apprehensions about a challenging electoral competition for the PAP as they endeavor to identify a fitting replacement for the seasoned former minister.

    The future of West Coast Group Representation Constituency (GRC) and the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) prospects in this closely contested area remain uncertain. Although the departure of Iswaran does not automatically translate to PAP losing control of the GRC, there is a significant void to be filled. Iswaran, a well-regarded and popular Member of Parliament (MP) in West Coast, leaves a gap that the PAP must address.

    With Iswaran not seeking re-election, PAP faces the challenge of strengthening its position, especially considering the Progress Singapore Party’s (PSP) formidable performance in West Coast GRC during the 2020 General Election. In that closely contested race, PAP secured victory by a narrow margin of 51.69 percent. Given the circumstances surrounding Iswaran’s departure, there may be residents inclined to give the Opposition a chance in the GRC. 

    Many analysts contend that the People’s Action Party (PAP) will have difficulty finding prominent political figures among its members to succeed Iswaran. In addition to Iswaran, the party has also had to deal with Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation, which came about after it was revealed that he had an extramarital affair with PAP MP Cheng Li Hui. The departure of both Iswaran and Tan Chuan-Jin raises questions about the party’s ability to field prominent candidates. Additionally, Dr. Tan, the chairman of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), headed the team that ran in West Coast GRC in the 2020 General Election, emphasizing the difficult task facing the PAP in finding a capable replacement.

    As the impact of the Iswaran case is not confined to the West Coast GRC, the ruling party is demonstrating its commitment to undertaking strong measures against corruption nationwide. Deputy Prime Minister Wong highlighted Singapore’s ministerial code of conduct, emphasizing the prohibition of receiving gifts that could create conflicts of interest and obligations. This code, in effect since 1954 and subject to periodic updates, outlines the expected behavior and personal affairs management for ministers. Mr. Wong assured that the government would consistently review and enhance the code, incorporating insights gained from experiences such as the recent incident. Analysts, however, indicated that the existing checks and regulations within ministries are sufficient to ensure the proper reporting of gifts, mitigating the need for drastic alterations to the code.

    In a broader context, analysts commended the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) handling of Iswaran’s case, seeing it as a positive reflection of the party’s intolerance towards corruption. This firm adherence to the party’s values could resonate with younger voters, offering them insight into how the ruling party addresses significant crises involving its members. Nonetheless, the evolving political landscape poses challenges for PAP, as evidenced in the last election. In July 2020, PAP secured 83 out of 93 seats and 61.2% of the popular vote, marking its 13th consecutive general election victory since Singapore’s independence. However, this result represented a notable decline from the 2015 election. So, it is crucial for the PAP to take proactive measures in combating corruption and improving its public image.

  • All Eyes on Sabah: Sabah to Test Out New Political Alliances

    All Eyes on Sabah: Sabah to Test Out New Political Alliances

    Speculation is rife about the prospect of a state election in Sabah this year, despite the ongoing five-year mandate set to conclude in December 2025. The ruling Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) coalition has witnessed growing discussions surrounding the potential for an early election. While the GRS-led state government’s term is until September 2025, political analysts posit that GRS may leverage its strengthened position and new alliances before the Opposition can effectively organize. GRS and its component parties have had sufficient time to settle, in contrast to Opposition parties like Sabah Umno and Parti Warisan, which are still finding their footing.

    The alliances forged during the 2020 state elections have undergone substantial transformations, with GRS aiming to solidify novel partnerships. Recognizing an opportunity to capitalize on the perceived vulnerability of Warisan, GRS may position Sabah Umno as its primary contender in Muslim Bumiputera seats. The last Sabah state election, held on September 26, 2020, marked a departure from the tradition of aligning with the Malaysia general election date  The Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) coalition emerged victorious in this election, securing a simple majority of 38 seats. Within three days, Hajiji Noor from BERSATU–PN was sworn in as the Chief Minister. The GRS coalition, comprising Perikatan Nasional with 17 seats, Barisan Nasional with 14 seats, and PBS with 7 seats, became the largest electoral coalition in Sabah since September 2020.

    Following the Malaysian general election in November 2022 and the formation of a government alliance between Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional, GRS announced its inclusion in the alliance. Despite GRS members Bersatu, SAPP, and STAR initially aligning with Perikatan Nasional, they signed a cooperation agreement with other parties. MLAs and MPs from Bersatu Sabah announced their departure from the party to become direct members of GRS, aligning with the coalition at the federal level. On December 17, GRS officially expelled Bersatu from the coalition. STAR, another member party of both GRS and PN, announced its exit from PN on December 5. As of December 2022, SAPP is the only member party of both GRS and PN.

    Despite these changes, the government’s status quo in Sabah remains unchanged. Although PH and WARISAN are allied with GRS at the federal level, they continue to oppose the GRS-led administration at the state level.

    The Sabah political crisis of 2023, widely known in local media as Langkah Kinabalu or the Kinabalu Move, commenced in January, when the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS)-led state government of Sabah collapsed. The collapse occurred as the Barisan Nasional (BN), a key coalition party, withdrew its support. Bung Moktar Radin, the Leader of UMNO Sabah (a component party of BN) and the Kinabatangan Member of Parliament (MP), along with Lamag Assemblyman, attributed the withdrawal to a lack of confidence in Chief Minister Hajiji Noor’s leadership. UMNO Sabah expressed its intention to shift support from the GRS coalition to the WARISAN Plus coalition. On January 9, Malaysian leaders Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi travelled to Kota Kinabalu to engage with Sabah’s political leaders in an effort to address the crisis. 

    As of February 6, there have been no alterations in the status quo regarding the Sabah government. This was influenced by the public support extended to Hajiji by five UMNO MLAs, notwithstanding Bung’s decision. Additionally, a state cabinet reshuffle took place on January 11 as a response to the unfolding events. On May 25, the Sabah State Legislative Assembly ultimately sanctioned the Anti-Switching Parties Law, commonly referred to as the Anti-frogs habit.

    While an early election could benefit GRS given its current strength, concerns about dissatisfaction and seat distribution within the coalition pose risks. Analysts caution that sabotages and significant losses could occur if internal tensions escalate. Despite the evolving political landscape, analysts believe that GRS could perform well if its rivals struggle to solidify alliances. 

    Elections have the potential to either fracture or fortify a coalition. According to reports, the Sabah government is exploring the latter scenario. There is an opportunity to call for elections to bolster the coalition, capitalize on the challenges faced by the opposition, and extend its tenure of rule.

  • Anwar Calls Mahathir’s Comments on Malaysian Indians ‘Unacceptable’

    Anwar Calls Mahathir’s Comments on Malaysian Indians ‘Unacceptable’

    Ruling a multi-ethnic nation within a democratic system presents undeniable challenges, yet Malaysia distinguishes itself with diverse communities harmoniously coexisting. The nation’s demographics reflect a myriad of ethnic groups, with the majority hailing from Austronesian origin, primarily Malays. Significantly, substantial contributions from Chinese and Indian minorities enrich Malaysia’s cultural diversity. The country has realized noteworthy economic and welfare advancements through the integration of various ethnicities. Nevertheless, the political landscape remains confronted by challenges, especially in addressing racial comments.

    A recent incident involved former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who made a controversial statement during an interview with an Indian television channel, Thanthi TV. Dr. Mahathir alleged that the Indian and Chinese communities in Malaysia do not fully embrace Malaysian identity, suggesting that their loyalty lies with their countries of origin. Furthermore, he advocated for non-Malays to assimilate and “become Malay.” These remarks sparked criticism from various leaders who condemned them as racist.

    In the past months, Dr. Mahathir has consistently advocated for assimilating minorities to create a monoethnic Malaysia. His alignment with Parti Bumiputera Perkasa Malaysia (Putra), led by Datuk Ibrahim Ali, signals his support for the Malay supremacist group Perkasa. This development has intensified the debate on the path Malaysia should take regarding its diverse cultural landscape.

    The recent racist remarks made by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad against the Indian community in Malaysia have drawn criticism from Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who described them as irresponsible and irrelevant. The finance minister, Anwar, emphasized the value of appreciating and accepting every Malaysian for who they are, regardless of their origins. Given that Dr. Mahathir was a former prime minister, he thought that Dr. Mahathir’s statement was improper. Anwar brought up the fact that Mahathir has a history of disparaging remarks about different ethnicities, such as calling Chinese and Indians less devoted and Malays are lazy, without him. Anwar voiced his strong opposition to Mahathir’s remarks, claiming that they were a calculated attempt to deflect attention away from important matters.

    Voon Lee Shan, president of Parti Bumi Kenyalang, emphasized the importance of acknowledging the contributions made by ethnic Chinese and Indians in areas like the economy and education. Voon emphasized that these groups, together with Malaysians of other ethnic backgrounds, were essential to the development of the country’s economy. Furthermore, he pointed out that a large number of Chinese and Indian people succeeded financially without receiving a lot of help from the government and then gave back to society by paying taxes; there are no examples of these communities’ personalities being investigated or prosecuted in Malaysia for tax evasion. 

    Minister for National Unity Datuk Aaron Ago Dagang conveyed his dissatisfaction with Dr. Mahathir’s remarks, stressing that the veteran lawmaker ought to act as an example of harmony instead of inciting conflict. In his remarks, Mahathir claimed that “Indian society in Malaysia is still not completely loyal to this country because they identify with their country of origin.” Dagang denounced this claim. The method of national integration, not assimilation, has been ingrained in the nation’s ideals for 60 years, Dagang emphasized, and Malaysia gained independence through a social contract. He underlined that Malaysians adopt this strategy as a way of life. 

    Speaking in their mother tongues and engaging in their own cultures should not be grounds for questioning the loyalty of the Indian and Chinese minorities, according to Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo. Deo reminded Mahathir that Malaysians of all races have made substantial contributions to the country’s development and begged him to desist from making inflammatory remarks. He cited the clear statement in the Federal Constitution that discrimination on the grounds of gender, race, place of birth, religion, or descent is forbidden unless otherwise permitted. 

    Former Klang MP Charles Santiago criticized Mahathir’s remarks, labelling them as “venom” and called for action against him for making potentially harmful and divisive statements in the multicultural society of Malaysia. Santiago argued that Mahathir’s encouragement of bigotry and hate goes against the principles of unity, undermining any positive contributions he may have made to the country.

    Former DAP MP Kasthuri Patto expressed her disagreement with Dr. Mahathir’s comments, asserting that he should be the last person to speak about loyalty. Thiban Subbramaniam, the PKR chief in Kuala Selangor, filed a police report against Mahathir, accusing him of making inflammatory statements against the Chinese and Indian communities. Subbramaniam expressed confidence in the police taking necessary action on issues related to race, religion, and royalty (3R).

    Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, Acting Muda president, called for an apology from the former premier, stating that Mahathir’s remarks put Malaysian-Indians in the position of having to defend themselves against prejudicial comments. Amira emphasized the loyalty of Malaysians to their country and rejected accusations and belittlement based on loyalty.

    In contrast, Malay Proclamation Secretariat chairman Khairuddin Abu Hassan defended Mahathir, asserting that he had been misunderstood. Khairuddin urged people to understand Mahathir’s statement in both explicit and implicit ways and cautioned against twisting his words out of context to sensationalize news that could fuel racial tensions. Khairuddin highlighted Mahathir’s advice to Malays not to be envious of other races and encouraged them to work consistently to regain the dignity of the people.

    In light of the increasing prevalence of far-right politics and ethnic tensions worldwide, Mahathir’s statement underscores the necessity for heightened regulation of racial slurs, especially in today’s era of unpredictable social media dynamics. For a nation that prides itself on its multi-ethnic culture, Mahathir’s remark is undeniably regrettable and deemed unacceptable.

  • Malaysia for Consistent Elected Government Tenures: An Examination

    Malaysia for Consistent Elected Government Tenures: An Examination

    Democracy stands as a noteworthy human accomplishment, and nations embracing democratic principles are often commended as progressive nations. Nonetheless, the escalating expenses associated with democratic processes, particularly the growing financial burden of elections, pose a significant challenge for public funds in many democratic nations. While essential for the functioning of a democratic system, the financial burden is considered a responsibility of democratic governments. However, if a government is unable to be formed following an election or if the tenure is prematurely terminated, it results in a substantial loss of public funds.

    To address this issue, numerous countries are actively considering legislative measures to alleviate the financial strain associated with elections. These efforts aim to maintain the democratic process while minimizing the economic impact on the nation. Malaysia, having experienced the turnover of three prime ministers during the challenging period of the COVID-19 era, is reportedly contemplating the introduction of a law. This proposed legislation would enable the sitting government to complete its full term in office, mitigating the risk of unwarranted political instability and safeguarding the Malaysian economy from further disruption.

    In an effort to avert any unjustified political instability, Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi declared his intention to put forth a law or policy that guarantees the government’s continuation for the duration of its mandate. Addressing the Opposition’s charges of bribery involving the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to sustain the present administration, Zahid highlighted the adverse impact of having three prime ministers during the 15th Parliamentary Session in Malaysia. This situation caused misery for the populace by upsetting the government and resulting in a lack of direction and bad management during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

    Zahid warned that it would be harmful to repeat such historical issues and asked the Opposition to reevaluate their strategy. He emphasized the necessity of a mental shift and the significance of political stability at trying times such as the pandemic. In order to avoid similar interruptions in the future, Zahid suggested that a government should hold office until the conclusion of its term after receiving approval from the Agong. 

    The proposed legislation raises doubts about its objectives; while addressing political instability and cost reduction is commendable, as a democratic measure, it may not be a straightforward law. Allowing a poorly performing government to extend its tenure and hindering the potential realignment of political alliances post-election can lead to undemocratic governance. 

    The 15th general election in Malaysia is reported to have cost taxpayers up to RM1.1 billion, making it the most expensive national polls to date. The substantial increase in costs, doubling the expenditure from the previous elections, was primarily driven by the inclusion of around five million new voters. The Elections Commission acknowledged this surge in costs, particularly with a record-high voter turnout. Looking ahead, there is no doubt that election costs will continue to rise, and a country cannot overlook such significant financial implications.

    Enforcing a law to secure a government’s full term can offer economic stability by averting political upheaval, yet it raises concerns about potential compromises to democratic principles. Navigating the equilibrium between economic advantages and the increased threat to democratic principles, Malaysia’s proposed legislation presents a substantial challenge to the democratic framework.

  • Bridging Economies: Malaysia-Singapore Improves Economic Co-Operation

    Bridging Economies: Malaysia-Singapore Improves Economic Co-Operation

    Together, Malaysia and Singapore agreed to create a special economic zone along the Singaporean border in the southern province of Johor in Malaysia. The primary objectives include attracting investments and facilitating the seamless movement of people and goods across their shared boundaries.

    The Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) memorandum of understanding (MOU) was signed by Malaysia’s Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli and Singapore’s Trade and Industry Minister Gan Kim Yong to formalize their cooperation. Later, in a joint statement, the two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to moving forward with a thorough agreement.  The Memorandum of Understanding outlines Malaysia and Singapore’s collaborative efforts to improve the movement of people and goods across international borders while also fortifying the SEZ’s economic environment to draw in investments. 

    Exploring additional measures to boost the JS-SEZ’s growth, both countries are considering a passport-free passage system on both sides of the border and potential collaboration in the renewable energy sector. The overarching goal of the agreement is to create a business-friendly region in Johor, free from government restrictions, fostering economic growth and improving connectivity.

    Furthermore, the collaborative ventures are exploring potential additional initiatives, including the establishment of a consolidated one-stop business-investment service center in Johor tailored for Singaporean companies, the implementation of streamlined digital procedures for cargo clearance at land checkpoints, co-hosting an investors’ forum, and fostering cooperation in renewable energy within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ).

    In a separate development, both nations welcomed the completion of the initial connecting span for a new light rail transit system (RTS) that links Johor Bahru, the state capital of Johor, with Singapore. Spanning 4 km and boasting a peak capacity of up to 10,000 people per hour in each direction, the RTS is designed to connect Johor Bahru’s Bukit Chagar station with Singapore’s Woodlands North station. Anticipated to commence passenger service by the end of 2026, the RTS aims to alleviate traffic on the Johor-Singapore Causeway, the busiest land crossing globally. The Johor-Singapore Causeway witnesses a daily transit of over 350,000 individuals. Valued at 10 billion ringgit ($2.2 billion), this train link is the latest addition to the Causeway, initially constructed in 1924 and subsequently undergoing various expansions and upgrades.

    There were discussions between Malaysia and Singapore centered around the possibility of developing a 350-kilometre high-speed railway connecting Singapore and Kuala Lumpur, supplementing their current connectivity. Despite the initial announcement in 2013, the project was shelved in 2020 due to disagreements and financial hurdles on the Malaysian side. Recent signals indicate a potential inclination from Anwar’s government to resurrect the project, contingent upon substantial cost savings.

    Malaysia and Singapore have established a thriving bilateral trade, anticipating a value of $90.3 billion in 2022. This exceeds the combined trade of both nations with Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli underscored the importance of the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ), describing it as a distinctive opportunity for both countries to amplify cross-border trade and movement. These agreements are poised to further fortify the already intimate economic bonds between Singapore and peninsular Malaya. The positive momentum is evident in the upward trajectory of Malaysian stocks with substantial exposure to Johor in the weeks leading up to the signing of the memorandum. The expected deepening of the relationship between these nations is anticipated to deliver an additional economic stimulus for the region.

  • Global Passport Powerhouses: Singapore Shares the Crown with Five Nations in 2024

    Global Passport Powerhouses: Singapore Shares the Crown with Five Nations in 2024

    Once again, Singapore has solidified its standing as a global leader, with its passport claiming the top position as the world’s most robust in 2024. Joining Singapore at the pinnacle of the Henley Passport Index are France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Spain. This index, which gauges the number of destinations accessible to travelers without a pre-approved visa, underscores the exceptional travel capabilities of these nations—a pivotal metric in today’s era of global business. In a recent press release, Henley & Partners, the consulting firm responsible for the index, highlighted that residents of these six countries can freely explore an impressive 194 destinations worldwide without the need for a visa.

    Singapore and Japan, both Asian nations, have consistently held the top spot on the index for the past five years. During this period, Japan maintained its leading position, except in 2023 when it secured the second spot. Singapore, on the other hand, claimed the top rank in 2019, 2021, and 2023, while securing the second place in 2018, 2020, and 2022.

    Examining passport rankings within Southeast Asian nations, Malaysia holds the 12th rank with visa-free access to 182 nations. Brunei impressively secures the 20th rank with 168 visa-free destinations, while Timor Leste ranks 56th with 96 visa-free destinations. Thailand secures the 63rd rank with visa-free access to 82 destinations. Indonesia holds the 66th position with 78 visa-free destinations. The Philippines secures the 73rd rank with visa-free access to 69 states. Cambodia is positioned at the 86th rank with 56 visa-free destinations, and Vietnam stands at the 87th position with 55 visa-free destinations. Laos holds the 90th position with 51 visa-free destinations, and Myanmar, occupying the 92nd rank, offers visa-free access to 48 nations, marking the lowest ranking in the region.

    When it comes to international travel, the influence of a passport should not be underestimated, as it significantly shapes the ease with which its possessor can traverse borders and embark on new journeys. The Henley Passport Index stands as a global inventory that evaluates countries based on the travel freedom granted to their citizens, providing a comprehensive overview of the world’s most influential passports. This index assesses passports by considering the number of countries their holders can visit without the requirement of a pre-arrival visa. The ranking relies on data supplied by the International Air Transport Authority (IATA), which maintains the most extensive and precise travel information database worldwide. This data undergoes supplementation and updates through in-house research conducted by the firm, alongside other open-source online data. This approach is implemented to uphold the accuracy of the information provided by IATA, especially considering the ongoing updates to visa policies.

    The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been the Henley Passport Index’s biggest upward mover over the last ten years, according to Henley & Partners. According to the company, the United Arab Emirates has improved its visa-free score by 106 destinations since 2014, propelling it up to the 11th rank from the 55th position. According to the press release, China and Ukraine are two of the top five nations with the greatest rankings gains since 2014. With 148 visa-free countries, Ukraine is now ranked 32nd, while China comes in at number 62 with access to 85 visa-free places. On the other end of the scale, Afghanistan comes in at number 104 on the list. 

    As a crucial hub for international business and a bridge between Asia and Europe, Singapore benefits significantly from its high passport ranking. In the competitive landscape of the hospitality sector in Asia, where rivals such as Hong Kong, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia prevail, Singapore’s robust passport ranking and diplomatic strengths provide a distinct advantage.

  • Navigating Diplomacy: Marcos and Widodo Collaborate in the South China Sea

    Navigating Diplomacy: Marcos and Widodo Collaborate in the South China Sea

    During a recent meeting in Manila, Presidents Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines and Joko Widodo of Indonesia engaged in discussions concerning the latest developments in the South China Sea and strategies for enhancing regional cooperation. Given that both nations are archipelagos with numerous islands in the South China Sea, they play pivotal roles in managing tensions in the region.

    Following their bilateral meeting, Marcos characterised the discussions as “fruitful and honest,” underscoring the significance of regional developments, particularly the evolving scenario in the South China Sea. The heightened focus is seen as imperative to foster unity among nations and establish a collective front for negotiations and defence against China’s territorial claims.

    Indonesia’s Foreign Minister, Retno Marsudi, expressed her government’s willingness to collaborate with other Southeast Asian countries in finalizing the long-awaited code of conduct for the South China Sea. Retno stated, “On the South China Sea, Indonesia is prepared to work together with all ASEAN member states, including the Philippines, to expedite the finalization of the Code of Conduct.” This commitment is made in consideration of the overlapping claims with China by several neighboring nations, including Indonesia.

    With the primary goal of fostering stability in the region, there is a strong emphasis on addressing conflicts in the South China Sea through diplomatic means, as highlighted by the collaborative endeavor to establish a Code of Conduct. The effort involves China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which have long sought to create a framework for negotiating the code of conduct—a concept initially proposed in 2002. Despite assurances from all parties to accelerate and expedite the process, progress has been notably slow.

    The “nine-dash line,” which China uses to demarcate its territorial claims on maps, encroaches on the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam and stretches up to 1,500 km (900 miles) south of the Chinese mainland. There are still worries that China’s influence and interests in the region could cause conflicts among Southeast Asian countries, even after a 2016 international arbitral tribunal ruling invalidated most of China’s claims—a decision Beijing rejected. President Marcos addressed the need for more collaboration among ASEAN members, emphasizing that Indonesia and the Philippines both reaffirmed their adherence to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The legal foundation guiding all activity in seas and oceans is UNCLOS. 

    The necessity of bolstering cohesion and centrality within the Southeast Asian bloc was underscored by President Widodo. He said, “[We also agreed] for ASEAN to continue upholding the principles of international law and serving as a positive force for peace, stability, and prosperity.” Both presidents pushed for calm communication between all sides in the South China Sea in reaction to the increased tensions there, which were reported by the foreign ministers of ASEAN last month. Increased marine encounters in the disputed waterway have been a sign of the Philippines and China’s rising tensions in recent months. In light of conflicting territorial claims, maintaining regional security is complicated and difficult, as seen by the urgent need for diplomatic solutions. 

    Additionally, Manila and Jakarta decided to strengthen their border security cooperation. This cooperative endeavor entails hastening the rewrite of border patrol agreements and initiating talks to establish continental boundaries. The stability and security of the area are strengthened by this commitment.

    Although there have been territorial disputes in the South China Sea for millennia, there has been an increase in tension in recent years due to different geopolitical developments, Taiwan’s elections, and the United States’ deteriorating international ties. Southeast Asian countries’ ability to work together and overcome these obstacles will determine how this area and the world order develop in the future.