Tag: World

  • Surprising Development: UN Approves Gaza Ceasefire Resolution as US Abstains

    Surprising Development: UN Approves Gaza Ceasefire Resolution as US Abstains

    The United States faced a critical decision amid the worsening situation in Gaza, with escalating retaliatory actions leading to a humanitarian crisis. Despite feeling powerless to halt the violence, the US initially contemplated vetoing the UN Security Council’s call for a ceasefire in Gaza during the Israel-Hamas conflict. However, it ultimately chose to abstain from the vote. The resolution passed unanimously, leaving Israel significantly isolated on the international stage. The chamber erupted in cheers upon the ratification of the ceasefire resolution, indicating widespread support for peace efforts.

    After vetoing three previous resolutions, the United States found itself at the center of attention once again as the United Nations Security Council convened on Monday to push for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, especially during the remaining weeks of Ramadan. In a surprise move, as no one expected, The resolution finally received the green light after the Biden administration withdrew its veto threat, choosing instead to abstain from the vote. This decision marked a notable shift in the US’s diplomatic approach towards Israel, albeit temporary. With the conflict’s grim toll revealing over 32,000 lives lost, mostly women and children, and more than 75% of Gaza’s population displaced, the urgency for the resolution became undeniable. Interestingly, on the same day the US refrained from vetoing the UN ceasefire vote, allowing its passage, the Biden administration also affirmed that Israel hadn’t breached international law or hindered humanitarian aid to Gaza’s residents, despite ongoing concerns.

    The US continues to remain firmly committed to its partnership with Israel while juggling allegiance with a more sophisticated understanding of its behavior. The Biden administration has chosen to believe Israel’s assurances throughout the conflict, even in the face of strong evidence suggesting possible violations of international law. 

    It’s quite notable how swiftly the US adopted this position, especially considering that just a week prior, the UN’s foremost authority on food security had issued a dire warning about an imminent famine in northern Gaza. This area, housing 1.1 million individuals – almost half of Gaza’s population – is grappling with severe malnutrition and acute food shortages. Despite consistent alerts raised by humanitarian organizations and UN officials since December, shedding light on Israel’s deliberate policies exacerbating starvation in Gaza and the looming famine threat, the Biden administration has largely overlooked these concerns. 

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conveyed strong displeasure regarding the Biden administration’s choice not to veto the latest UN resolution. In a retaliatory move, he called off a planned visit by a high-level Israeli delegation to Washington later that week. This delegation, consisting of Israeli military, intelligence, and humanitarian officials, aimed to discuss alternatives to a potential ground invasion of Gaza’s southern city of Rafah, where over a million Palestinians have sought refuge. Despite persistent warnings from the US, Netanyahu remains resolute in his intentions for a military intervention in Rafah, disregarding the grave consequences for civilians.

    However, Netanyahu tempered some of his frustration towards Biden by refraining from recalling Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who is currently visiting Washington. Gallant advocates for expediting the processing of a substantial arsenal of US weapons requested by Israel. These include thousands of bombs and other munitions crucial for Israel’s ongoing conflict in Gaza, as well as more advanced weaponry like new F-35 and F-15 fighter jets and Apache attack helicopters, which have extended production timelines.

    Netanyahu’s strategic response – simultaneously resisting US pressure regarding civilian protection in Rafah while persistently seeking additional American weaponry – captures the intricate dynamics of the US-Israeli relationship under the Biden administration. It underscores a reality that the Biden administration has sought to downplay: the ongoing violence in Gaza heavily relies on deep complicity and support from the United States.

    White House spokesperson John Kirby clarified that the UN vote didn’t signal a shift in US policy, but it did indicate a notable divergence between the Biden administration and the Israeli government. This resolution marked a long-awaited display of international solidarity on the Gaza issue, especially given the dire humanitarian situation, with over 32,000 reported Palestinian casualties, thousands missing, and UN agencies warning of an impending famine. 

    Meanwhile, in Washington, Israeli Defense Minister Gallant reiterated Israel’s commitment to continue fighting until the release of hostages held in Gaza. “We cannot morally justify halting the conflict while there are still hostages in Gaza,” Gallant stated ahead of his initial meeting with US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan. He cautioned that a lack of a decisive victory in Gaza could escalate tensions and potentially lead to conflict in the northern regions.

    Israel’s desire for retaliation is understandable, as they prioritize the safety of their innocent citizens and seek to reclaim hostages, including women and children, held by the terrorist organization Hamas. While their actions may be justified in this regard, the operation to eradicate terrorism and rescue hostages has tragically resulted in the deaths of over 30,000 Palestinian individuals and left many others facing famine. Regardless of the reasons behind support for Hamas or the celebration of violence against Israelis, Israel’s response has unfortunately led to the loss of innocent lives as well.

    The United States, often seen as the big brother or father figure to Israel, has typically been protective and overlooked its actions. However, it’s a hopeful sign that, for the first time in recent history, the father figure isn’t making excuses for the son’s misdeeds. At Least some people hope that abstaining from voting on the UN resolution will pave the way for peace in Gaza and the release of all captives held by Hamas.

  • Moscow Attack: How Secular Central Asian States Become Recruitment Hubs for Terrorist Organizations

    Moscow Attack: How Secular Central Asian States Become Recruitment Hubs for Terrorist Organizations

    Four individuals faced court proceedings in Moscow, accused in connection to the tragic terrorist assault on the Crocus City concert hall last Friday, which resulted in the loss of 137 lives. According to the TASS State news agency, the defendants, confirmed as Tajikistan citizens, were ordered to be held in custody for a duration of two months following a hearing on Sunday.

    The international media focused on the Tajikistani nationality of the suspects, moving away from allegations against Ukraine. This situation prompts a reconsideration of Central Asian nations, known for their peaceful tendencies and reluctance towards Islamic extremism, despite Islam’s prevalence. Unlike certain Islamic countries, Central Asian societies have shown a more flexible approach to religious practices, often influenced by Soviet-era perspectives. Nonetheless, recent events suggest a changing landscape in the region.

    Extremists from Tajikistan and various other Central Asian countries have been implicated in a series of recent ISIS assaults across Europe and Iran. In January, a tragic bombing during an Iranian commemoration ceremony resulted in approximately 100 fatalities. Now, in March, individuals from Tajikistan are suspected of involvement in the Moscow attack. Both Iran and Russia have vehemently opposed the Islamic State, actively engaging them in the Middle East. This casts doubt on ISIS’s claim of responsibility. Initially, Iran accused Israel and the US of the attack, but later, their intelligence ministry identified the mastermind and bombmaker as Tajik nationals. According to reports from the Iranian government press agency, the suspect entered Iran from the southeast border, departing just two days prior to the attack after constructing the bombs. Additionally, one of the suicide bombers was also Tajik.

    US and European intelligence agencies have observed a notable surge in global plots associated with ISIS-K, with some analysts considering it the most formidable ISIS affiliate outside of Africa. According to a UN report, in July and August, seven individuals from Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Kyrgyzstan, linked to ISIS-K, were apprehended in Germany while plotting significant terrorist attacks, actively acquiring weapons and identifying potential targets. German authorities apprehended three Tajik individuals and one Uzbek national on December 31, suspecting them of planning an attack on Cologne Cathedral on New Year’s Eve. These men were linked to ISIS by investigators. Tajik nationals have been implicated in various other plots across Europe and Turkey in recent years. In January, two ISIS militants from Tajikistan and Russia carried out an attack on a church in Istanbul, resulting in one fatality and one injury. Additionally, earlier this month, Russian security forces eliminated two Kazakhstan nationals believed to be orchestrating an ISIS-KP-associated assault on a synagogue in the Kaluga region, southwest of Moscow. This shift towards international targets may be attributed to directives from senior IS leadership in Iraq and Syria, where the organization has suffered significant setbacks.

    The UN report underscored the potential for extremist Islamist groups to recruit amid the conflict in Gaza. However, IS has grappled with balancing its animosity towards Hamas while desiring to incite violence against longstanding adversaries. The report noted IS’s cautious public communications in response to events in Israel and Gaza, aimed at exacerbating religious intolerance. Despite this, IS maintains staunch opposition to Hamas, labeling its members as apostates. IS’s media campaigns have focused on exploiting the situation in Gaza to provoke potential lone actors into carrying out attacks.

    Presently, the Islamic State (IS) justifies indoctrinating minds, portraying itself as a champion of Islam and savior of Islam from suffering. Economic stagnation and widespread unemployment fuel the interest of disillusioned youth, priming them for participation in what they perceive as a holy war. They consider anyone opposed to their ideology, including Muslims, Christians, and Jews, as enemies.

    In Central Asian countries, societal dynamics are becoming increasingly volatile as the influence of Soviet remnants diminishes among the younger generation, who are now gravitating more towards their Islamic identity. With Russia’s influence waning, other external actors, including the Islamic State and various competing factions, are seizing the opportunity to exert influence in the region. Economic growth has been sluggish, compounded by pervasive authoritarianism, corruption within the government, high unemployment rates, and a lack of prosperity for the common populace, with benefits accruing primarily to politicians and businessmen. This socioeconomic landscape provides fertile ground for extremist ideologies to flourish.

    Failure by the government to address these pressing issues not only jeopardizes the country’s reputation and diaspora but also exacerbates the risk of radicalization. Reports indicate growing apprehension within the Tajik diaspora in Russia, with social media glorifying Tajik and Central Asian identities of terrorists. Such developments threaten to erode the secular image of Central Asia, potentially aligning them with the likes of Pakistan and Afghanistan, further entrenching their misery.

  • How Will Article 23 Impact Hong Kong’s Political Landscape?

    How Will Article 23 Impact Hong Kong’s Political Landscape?

    The Beijing-leaning Hong Kong Parliament unanimously approved the new national security law (NSL), which is frequently referred to as Article 23. This quick-moving legislative process took place over a very short 12-day period, followed by a shorter one-month public consultation session. This surge in restrictions on basic liberties exposes a troubling trend in Hong Kong towards greater authoritarian control and poses a major danger to the region’s much-loved autonomy. Opponents of the NSL, democratic countries, and international media argue that it ushers in a “New Era of Authoritarianism”, exacerbating the denial of citizens rights and liberties through the imposition of severe punishments. 

    Chinese Authorities point to the need to “Close Loopholes” and stop the disturbances that occurred in 2019 as a result of the police using excessive force to justify the need for the new law. They claim that the overwhelming majority of public responses have been positive, dismissing a significant portion of negative ones on the grounds that they are the result of “Overseas Anti-China Organizations” or runaways. 

    The implementation of a stringent national security law (NSL) is undoubtedly a setback for Hong Kong’s desire for autonomy and its loss of identity. This law, which is seen as a major shift from the “One Country, Two Systems’ ‘ structure that formerly defined the region’s governance. With its expansive scope and wide-ranging authority, the NSL changed Hong Kong’s legal landscape. 

    The 2020 NSL, the predecessor of Current NSL has already ensnared notable individuals in legal processes, including former Legislative council members and well-known campaigners like Jimmy Lai and Joshua Wong. Treason and sedition charges will carry harsher punishments, including the possibility of life in jail  in the new NSL. There are also worries regarding due process because it is anticipated that procedures for detention without charge would be greatly expanded. 

    The NSL’s expansive interpretation is especially concerning since it can apply to seemingly innocent behaviors like possessing previous issues of the pro-democracy journal Apple Daily. These behaviors could now be considered legal infractions, disqualifying anybody from bringing up a “Reasonable Defense”. 

    The UN and western countries have come under fire from China for their criticism of Hong Kong’s hastily passed national security bill, which was pushed through the city’s pro-Beijing legislature this past week. When the US, UK, Australia, Japan, Canada, and UN expressed their worries, Beijing’s ambassadors dismissed them. Asserting that the new rule is “Legitimate, Lawful, and Beyond Reproach”, China’s ambassador to the US, Liu Pengyu, emphasized that it targets “A tiny minority of individuals involved in offenses that seriously jeopardize national security” Liu refuted American criticism by citing a plethora of domestic national security legislation, and gave the assurance that the bill will adequately protect the regular operations of foreign organizations, businesses, and individuals. 

    Lin Jian, a spokesman for the foreign ministry, declared that China’s leadership vehemently condemns any countries or organizations that disrespect the Hong Kong national security action. Lin argued that the law upholds the fundamental principle of upholding and honoring human rights by ensuring the protection of the freedoms and rights enjoyed by Hong Kong residents.

    Although the governments of China and Hong Kong guarantee the security of businesses, a number of business associations have voiced apprehensions regarding the expansive definitions presented in the recently enacted legislation, namely with respect to state secrets and espionage. The European Union warned of the law’s major repercussions on the operations of its office in the city, as well as those of other organizations and businesses, and highlighted concerns about the law’s potential impact on Hong Kong’s long-term appeal as an international commercial hub in a statement. 

    Once hailed as Asia’s most cosmopolitan hub and a key global financial center, Hong Kong now grapples with perceptions of closing its doors due to fresh national security regulations. The city faces the delicate task of bolstering security while preserving its stature as a global powerhouse. Despite efforts such as the introduction of new visa schemes, reduced property stamp taxes, and hosting major international events post-pandemic and amid a crackdown on pro-democracy movements, these initiatives have predominantly favored mainland Chinese nationals. Consequently, whispers of multinational corporations discreetly relocating operations to Singapore have surfaced in recent months.

  • The Downfall of Syria: 13 Years of Struggle for Power End to Ruin

    The Downfall of Syria: 13 Years of Struggle for Power End to Ruin

    After thirteen years, Syria is still at war. One of the worst humanitarian crises of the twenty-first century, bringing Syria, a country rich in historical legacy, to complete collapse. Amidst the continuous turmoil, a number of state-sponsored and non-state organizations have emerged, each contributing to the obstruction of Syria’s development and the enormous exodus of its citizens.

    Big Rallies were visible in the divided Idlib region on the occasion of the 13th anniversary of Syrian Conflict, a region under the control of rebels opposed to Bashar al-Assad. Notably, alongside chants against Assad, protestors also voice opposition to jihadist leaders in the area. Currently, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), formerly affiliated with al-Qaida, exerts significant influence over much of the northwest, including Idlib. People don’t find any difference between Assad and separatist now, they all treat them the same. People slowly understand what they wish for and what they fight for will never reach them. Idlib is witnessing a lot of protests as the people discontent, Recent weeks have witnessed numerous protests against HTS leader Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, sparked by the death of an individual while in the group’s custody. 

    There were protests at the 13th anniversary that took place outside of Idlib as well. Hundreds of people gathered to commemorate the occasion in the government-held city of Sweida in the south. This comes after about seven months of anti-government demonstrations in the wider Sweida region, which is mostly home to the Druze minority in Syria and has up until now mostly stayed out of the conflict. 

    It all started in March 2011, when nationwide demonstrations against Bashar al-Assad’s government gained traction and resulted in sizable assemblies in favor of democracy. Assad crushed the protest by using force. The intense persecution carried out by the regime sparked the Syrian insurgency and gave rise to armed opposition groups like the Free Syrian Army. By mid-2012, the fighting had intensified and become a full-fledged civil war. 

    Understanding the multipolar conflict in Syria requires deliberate effort. Various foreign nations, including the United States, Iran, Russia, and Turkey, have provided support to different factions involved. Russia has conducted airstrikes and ground operations in Syria. Meanwhile, the international coalition led by the United States, has primarily focused on combating the Islamic State while occasionally backing anti-Assad forces such as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and the Revolutionary Commando Army. Turkey, supporting the Syrian National Army (SNA), has controlled parts of northern Syria since 2016 and has engaged in conflicts with the Assad regime, the Islamic State, and the SDF.

    The Kurds, a significant factor in the region, have shifted their alliances over time. They are against Turkey and joining forces with the United States against the Islamic State, they also fought alongside the SDF against Assad. In 2019, Kurdish leaders in Rojava, a region within Syria, brokered a significant agreement with the Assad government, prompted by the U.S. withdrawal from Syria. This agreement aimed to secure Syria’s support in repelling Turkish forces invading Syria and targeting Kurds. However, by 2023, the primary military conflict had transitioned from the Syrian government versus rebels to clashes between Turkish forces and factions within Syria.

    Turkish forces intensified their attacks on Kurdish forces in the Rojava region, launching airstrikes and ground assaults against the Syrian Democratic Forces starting in October 2023. These actions were purportedly in retaliation for the Ankara bombing, which the Turkish government attributed to assailants from northeastern Syria.

    While people died or living in the worst living conditions, Numerous political analysts, military strategists, and journalists strongly believe  that the Syrian Civil War is fundamentally rooted in a geopolitical rivalry between Russia and the United States, along with their respective allies in the region, concerning natural gas pipelines traversing Syria en route to European markets. The United States and its allies proposed the construction of the Qatar–Turkey pipeline, aiming to diminish Europe’s reliance on Russian natural gas, particularly crucial during winter months when many European households depend on Russian supplies. Conversely, Russia and its allies sought to thwart this project and instead promote the Iran–Iraq–Syria pipeline.

    Syrian President Bashar al-Assad rejected Qatar’s Proposal to construct a $10 billion Qatar-Turkey pipeline through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey. Allegedly, this refusal prompted clandestine CIA efforts to instigate a Syrian civil war, with the objective of pressuring Assad to step down and facilitate the installation of a pro-American leader who would endorse the pipeline deal. Leaked documents from 2009 indicate that the CIA commenced funding and supporting opposition factions in Syria to incite civil unrest.

    Russia supports Assad’s opposition to the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, favoring the promotion of the Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline, which would bolster Russia’s allies and enhance Iran’s economy. However, such business ventures in Syria have come at a significant human cost. The United States needed only some dates to start the project. There was hate fuming in Syria on Assad’s Addiction to power. Taking advantage of the situation, the United States has raised the Syrian Democratic Forces and other factions to challenge Assad’s regime.

    There are suspicions that even the Islamic State might have been a product of US intelligence, akin to the Taliban in Afghanistan. In this volatile scenario, various parties have vested interests: Turkey, Israel, Russia, Iran, everyone has blood on their hands.

    Syria has undergone fragmentation, with various entities asserting control and pursuing their own interests. The Assad regime still holds sway over most of the territory, officially recognized as the Syrian Arab Republic, and maintains influence in key cities like Damascus. Assad’s support network includes powerful allies such as Russia, Iran, China, and surprisingly, some Arab nations including Saudi Arabia.

    In northeastern Syria, the independent Administration of North and East Syria (AANES), also known as Rojava, serves as a de facto independent entity. Rojava aspires to autonomy inside Syria’s federal and democratic structure, not total independence. The area is divided into autonomous sub-areas that include Afrin, Jazira, Euphrates, Raqqa, Tabqa, Manbij, and Deir Ez-Zor. In the midst of the ongoing Rojava conflict in 2012, it gained de facto autonomy, with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the country’s recognized armed force, playing a crucial role. 

    The region has widespread support for its dedication to independent, pluralist, egalitarian, feminist, and universal democratic ideals in discussions with different groups and parties. Significant Kurdish, Arab, and Assyrian communities coexist with lesser ethnic Turkmen, Armenian, Circassian, and Yazidi populations in northeastern Syria, which has a diversified population.

    If the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES) succeeds in facing various challenges, including authoritarian tendencies, corruption, conflicts with Turkey, Kurdish forces, and Islamic State factions, there could be a possibility of a Syrian partition akin to the examples of Germany, Vietnam, and Korea. This scenario might entail a split between a Russia-backed Assad-controlled Syria and a West-backed AANES-controlled Syria.

    Apart from the Assad and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) administrations, there exists the Syrian Interim Government (SIG), established by the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, serving as an alternative governance structure in Syria. The SIG claims to be the sole legitimate government representing the Syrian opposition, challenging the authority of the Council of Ministers of the Syrian Arab Republic. Headquartered in Azaz, Aleppo Governorate, the interim government exercises indirect control over certain areas within the country. Turkey is in support of SIG and the weird United States who already made the situation complex also supports SIG sometimes.

    The Syrian Free Army (SFA), also known as the New Syrian Army (NSA) or Revolutionary Commando Army, is a Syrian opposition faction that controls territory near the Jordan–Syria border. It has received training from the United States Army and has been stationed at al-Tanf. Established as an expansion of the Allahu Akbar Brigade by defectors from the Syrian Arab Army and other rebels during the Syrian Civil War, the New Syrian Army aimed to drive out the Islamic State from southeastern Syria. 

    The Syrian Salvation Government, established in early November 2017 in Idlib Governorate, serves as a de facto alternative to the Syrian opposition’s governance. It was formed under the leadership of the Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rebel coalition. Following its inception, tensions emerged between the Syrian Salvation Government (SSG) and the Syrian Interim Government (SIG), leading to reports of HTS unilaterally dissolving several SIG-supported local councils across northwestern Syria. While HTS officially declares its independence from the civilian administration of the Salvation Government, labeling their relationship as a “partnership” aimed at providing security and an alternative to the Ba’athist government, some analysts challenge this assertion. They argue that HTS maintains control over the SSG’s security and economic sectors, using the SSG as a political facade.

    Interestingly, these opposing factions do not cooperate or attempt to form a unified government, despite not being opposed to the idea of a united Syria. While major opposition factions with ties to the United States receive financial or military assistance, they fail to forge alliances among themselves. This raises suspicions about the true interests of the United States in the region, especially as Russia remains steadfast in supporting Assad’s official government. As we delve deeper into the situation, questions arise about the possibility that the Islamic State’s foreign vehicles and weapons may not be coincidental.

    The once prominently featured brutality of the war has now given way to an uneasy stalemate. As aspirations for regime change diminish and peace negotiations prove fruitless, some regional governments are reconsidering their opposition to engaging with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad. With the government reclaiming control over much of the country, Assad’s grip on power appears increasingly secure.

    The conflict has taken a devastating toll, with estimates ranging from 470,000 to 610,000 violent deaths, making it the second deadliest conflict of the 21st century after the Second Congo War. International organizations have accused all involved parties—including the Assad government, IS, opposition groups, Iran, Russia, Turkey, and the U.S.-led coalition—of severe human rights abuses and massacres. This war has led to a significant refugee crisis. The number of refugees may have surpassed 6 million with the majority moving to Turkey. Across the political spectrum in the country, refugees have faced considerable blame, particularly for exacerbating the economic downturn. And all over Europe they are not welcomed like Ukrainians.

    Syria remains without a visible political solution. the urgent need to prioritize peace efforts to counteract the dire trends afflicting the nation. The UN estimates that 16.7 million Syrians will require humanitarian assistance or protection this year, marking the highest figure since the conflict began. Nearly 90% of Syrians live in poverty, according to UN data. UNICEF reports that almost 7.5 million children in Syria will require humanitarian aid in 2024. 

    A harsh punishment meted out to those who desire a democratic government. 

  • Putin Notified, Putin Conducted, Putin Declared Victory: The Tale of Another Russian Election Drama

    Putin Notified, Putin Conducted, Putin Declared Victory: The Tale of Another Russian Election Drama

    In a notable comedy film titled “The Dictator,” featuring Sacha Baron Cohen portraying the character General Aladeen, there’s a memorable scene where the dictator organizes his own version of the Olympics called the “Wadiyan Games.” In this event, the dictator competes in a sprint race where all other contestants must show deference to him. Any attempt to surpass him results in dire consequences, as he fires upon them. Eventually, when he grows weary, authorities intervene to swiftly conclude the race. This sequence was eerily similar to the Russian election, but it’s more horror in real life instead of a comedy on the screen.

    The Russian presidential election  became the biggest drama of the year. All opponents are either jailed or eliminated, with selections manipulated by the authorities. Despite these glaring irregularities, the election proceeds, with the lion’s share of votes conveniently going to Putin. There’s no votes  against mounting corruption, no votes over economic slowdown, and no votes from families of fallen soldiers. In this distorted scenario, it’s hardly a model of democracy.

    Vladimir Putin has declared a resounding victory in Russia’s presidential election amidst widespread protests both within the country and abroad, highlighting concerns over his increasingly authoritarian rule, the conflict in Ukraine, and a highly orchestrated electoral process that seemingly guaranteed his triumph. The election, criticized by the United States as “Clearly Neither Free Nor Fair”, saw Putin leading with 87.14% of the vote after 75% of the ballots were counted. Trailing behind was the Communist party candidate, Nikolai Kharitonov. The government boasted a record turnout of 74% of eligible voters, with Putin’s previous highest vote share recorded in 2018 at 76.7%, accompanied by a turnout of 67.5%.

    Putin delivered a victorious speech, acknowledging Western envy while staunchly affirming the fairness of the election. The conflict in Ukraine took center stage in his address, with Putin asserting his efforts to secure the border against recent incursions by pro-Ukrainian military units. He emphasized that his priorities as president would focus on the war in Ukraine, bolstering defense capabilities, and military strength.

    When questioned about the potential for a direct conflict with NATO, Putin remarked, “In today’s world, anything is possible…,Everyone understands that such an escalation could lead to a full-scale third world war. I doubt anyone desires that”. This statement was accompanied by a stark warning of the risks of nuclear war.

    For the first time, Putin addressed the death of Alexei Navalny, suggesting that he had consented to exchange the Kremlin critic for Russian prisoners in the West shortly before Navalny’s demise. “Regrettably, events unfolded as they did”, Putin remarked callously. “I agreed to one condition: a swap with no return. But that’s life”.

    In the shadow of Putin’s expected triumph, Russia’s beleaguered opposition mobilized to demonstrate its own resilience. Long queues formed at numerous polling stations across Moscow and other Russian cities as citizens responded to a call from Navalny’s widow to cast their ballots at noon on Sunday.

    Yulia Navalnaya, widow of Navalny, addressing supporters at the Russian embassy in Berlin, urged them to participate in a symbolic display of strength dubbed “Noon Against Putin”. This initiative, endorsed by her late husband before his untimely death in an Arctic prison a month prior, garnered significant attention.

    Navalnaya was met with resounding applause and chants from voters as she expressed gratitude for their turnout to honor her husband. “You give me hope that our efforts are not in vain, that we will continue to fight”, she remarked in a statement on Sunday, revealing that she had inscribed “Navalny” on her own ballot paper.

    Meanwhile, Navalny’s team called upon voters to invalidate their ballots, inscribe “Alexei Navalny” on the voting slip, or support one of the three candidates challenging Putin, despite the opposition’s characterization of them as Kremlin “Puppets.”

    On Friday, Russian prosecutors issued threats of five-year prison sentences to any voters participating in the “Noon Against Putin” initiative. In Kazan, a southern city, over 20 individuals were detained by police for joining the protest, as reported by the independent rights monitor OVD-Info. Similar arrests occurred in Moscow and St. Petersburg.

    In the lead-up to the election, Russian citizens engaged in various acts of protest, such as pouring dye into ballot boxes and initiating arson attacks at polling stations. Ella Pamfilova, Russia’s election commissioner, condemned those who spoiled ballots as “Bastards”, while former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned that such actions could result in treason sentences of up to 20 years. The Russian interior ministry reported 155 administrative charges and 61 criminal cases filed during the elections, Including 21 instances of obstructing voters’ rights.

    Amidst Putin’s impending victory, Russia disqualified anti-war candidates, ensuring the Russian leader faced no substantive competition. Authorities barred two candidates critical of the war in Ukraine, leaving three others who did not directly challenge Putin’s authority. Their participation aimed to lend an aura of legitimacy to the electoral process.

    Following constitutional amendments orchestrated in 2020, Putin is poised to seek two additional six-year terms after his current one expires next year. This could potentially extend his tenure until 2036, surpassing Joseph Stalin’s rule over the Soviet Union, which lasted 29 years. Consequently, Putin would become the country’s longest-serving leader since the era of the Russian empire. As Ukrainian President Zelensky aptly remarked, Russia now has a leader who appears addicted to power.

  • Yoon Suk Yeol’s Clever Political Move: How South Korea Doctors’ Strike Became Beneficial for the Ruling Party?

    Yoon Suk Yeol’s Clever Political Move: How South Korea Doctors’ Strike Became Beneficial for the Ruling Party?

    Yoon’s presidency since 2022 has been fraught with challenges. From grappling with a stagnant economy to weathering a corruption scandal involving his spouse, he has faced considerable adversity. With his first significant electoral trial looming, the potential for backlash seemed imminent. However, recent events have unexpectedly played in his favor. The doctors’ strike, which initially posed a severe threat to the nation’s healthcare system, has surprisingly become a boon for his administration. Amidst criticisms, some experts suggest that Yoon has adeptly capitalized on the turmoil within the medical sector, turning what could have been a major obstacle into a strategic opportunity.

    Last month, tensions escalated within President Yoon Suk Yeol’s administration as plans were unveiled to augment the capacity of medical schools by 2,000 spots, constituting a significant 67% surge. Yoon contends that this expansion is imperative to address long standing issues like the dearth of healthcare professionals in rural regions and specialized fields like pediatrics. However, the announcement has triggered a vehement backlash from the medical community. Thousands of trainee physicians have tendered their resignations, while senior doctors have organized large-scale protests. Consequently, hospitals have grappled with disruptions, leading to prolonged wait times for patients and delays in critical treatments, including surgical procedures.

    The issue poses a significant challenge for any government, yet the public has expressed satisfaction with the government’s attention to the nation’s most pressing concern: the shortage of medical professionals amid an aging population. Particularly in rural areas, there remains a shortage of doctors relative to the population, exacerbated by limited output from medical schools unable to meet demand. Adding to this, there’s a growing trend of doctors shifting from general medicine and essential fields to more lucrative sectors like cosmetics.

    The escalating conflict initially emerged as a protest against government proposals to significantly increase the number of trainee doctors, aiming to alleviate shortages in rural regions and accommodate the heightened demand due to South Korea’s rapidly aging demographic. However, the 11,994 striking doctors, comprising 93% of the trainee workforce, argue that recruiting an additional 2,000 students annually from 2025 could compromise the quality of healthcare services. Instead, they advocate for improvements in compensation and working conditions, with junior doctors particularly vocal about inadequate wages and increased workloads.

    While doctors voice concerns over their livelihoods and patient care, the government’s proactive measures are seen positively by the public. Consequently, the protesting doctors are viewed as self-serving antagonists by many citizens.

    The strike, involving nearly 12,000 doctors across 100 teaching hospitals, has resulted in canceled surgeries, extended waiting periods, and treatment delays, including for patients in need of emergency care, as reported by various media outlets. This week, the health ministry announced plans to deploy 20 military surgeons and 138 public health doctors to augment staffing levels at selected hospitals. However, officials deny assertions that the nation’s healthcare services have descended into chaos, though the strike has indeed severely impacted the medical system.

    President Yoon maintains that his initiative to train more doctors is devoid of political motives. Nonetheless, critics and analysts argue that the timing of this measure, preceding the April parliamentary elections, suggests otherwise. 

    Opponents assert that the government’s plan to increase doctor training is primarily geared toward electoral gains rather than providing a comprehensive solution to systemic medical issues. They highlight concerns such as doctors opting for more lucrative specialties like cosmetic surgery over critical areas like pediatrics or obstetrics due to high stress and low remuneration. Merely augmenting the number of doctors, they argue, will not resolve shortages. Instead, figures like Chung advocate for bolstering financial incentives for doctors in underserved fields, thereby making such areas of medicine more appealing.

    In reality, Yoon has strategically leveraged the doctors’ strike to portray himself as a resolute leader—a trait highly valued in many Asian countries. Some argue that the ongoing dispute with the doctors has bolstered Yoon’s political standing. With the legislative elections looming just a month away, Yoon seems confident that the public will not hold him responsible for the repercussions of the trainee doctors’ strike.

    Despite not enjoying widespread popularity, Yoon’s stance has garnered significant public support, with a majority favoring his plan and holding negative views toward the striking trainee doctors. Even Yoon’s rivals in the Democratic Party have criticized the doctors for neglecting their duty to uphold public health and have urged them to return to work. According to data from the pollster RealMeter, Yoon’s approval rating saw a modest increase from 39.5% to 41.9% in the week following the commencement of the trainee doctors’ strike—a noteworthy shift for Yoon, whose tenure has lacked notable achievements or widespread public backing.

    The extent to which Yoon will benefit from the standoff with the doctors in the upcoming election remains uncertain, but indications suggest that his party holds an advantage. The RealMeter poll indicates that Yoon’s People Power Party enjoys 46.7% support, surpassing the 39.1% for the Democratic Party, which is currently grappling with internal discord and prominent defections.

    Yoon and the doctors find themselves embroiled in an intensifying standoff, with the government now issuing warnings of legal repercussions against trainee doctors who have refused to resume their duties. On Wednesday, police summoned a spokesperson of the Korea Medical Association for questioning regarding their involvement in the trainee doctors’ strike. Concerns have mounted within South Korea’s government regarding the impact of the month-long dispute on essential healthcare services.

    In response, the health ministry has initiated measures to potentially revoke the medical licenses of thousands of striking doctors. The ministry disclosed that it has commenced procedures that could result in the suspension of licenses for 4,900 striking doctors if they persist in defying orders to return to work. Additionally, the ministry has issued administrative notifications, enforcing earlier warnings that strikers could face a three-month suspension—a penalty that could impede their path to specialization by at least a year.

    Critics of the recruitment plan have accused President Yoon Suk Yeol of exploiting medical reforms to bolster the electoral prospects of his People Power party in the upcoming national assembly elections. However, public sentiment seems to contradict these criticisms. A recent poll conducted by the Yonhap news agency revealed that 84% of respondents support the notion of hiring more doctors, with 43% advocating for severe penalties for striking physicians—a trend favoring Yoon’s agenda.

    Yet, the ongoing turmoil within the medical sector is poised to adversely affect both the populace and the government. As highlighted in an editorial in the Kyunghyang Shinmun newspaper, “Doctors and the government are not adversaries in a boxing ring. People’s patience is wearing thin… a resolution to this impasse must be sought through meaningful dialogue.” While this situation may result in political gains for the president, it also symbolizes a failure of a modern state that should prioritize the attainment of effective healthcare solutions for its citizens.

  • Hong Kong’s New Domestic Security Law: Hong Kong is Ready to be Yet Another Chinese City

    Hong Kong’s New Domestic Security Law: Hong Kong is Ready to be Yet Another Chinese City

    China effectively stifled any further protests in Hong Kong. There is no visible response to the new domestic security law, unlike the widespread protests of 2019–20, which were the largest in Hong Kong’s history. The authorities effectively leveraged the COVID-19 pandemic and stringent quarantine measures to quell the demonstrations and opposite voices. The detention of more than one hundred people, including well-known campaigners, was the consequence of the protests. The tough crackdown of protest led to a wave of widespread departure from the city, and more control of China in Hong Kong. 

    Now, Hong Kong is set to pass a new  national security law which will complement one imposed by Beijing in 2020, outlawing five new types of offenses and fulfilling the city’s constitutional obligations. Following a failed attempt in 2003, the second endeavor to introduce the law encountered minimal opposition and garnered majority support, as stated by the government after concluding a month-long consultation process based on a working paper published on January 30. Subsequently, on March 8, after the conclusion of the consultations, draft legislation was introduced under the title Safeguarding National Security Bill. And it’s expected to be implemented by mid-april.

    Amid growing concerns over dwindling freedoms in Hong Kong, the legislative council has all set to implement the new domestic national security law. The bill, referred to as Article 23, upon approval, will be incorporated into Hong Kong’s mini-constitution and will coexist alongside the Beijing-imposed national security law. Activists and rights groups are sounding the alarm over the city’s efforts to tighten restrictions on human rights and dissent  its financial hub status. Amnesty International has criticized the swift legislative progress under Article 23, expressing concerns over the government’s apparent eagerness to erode human rights protections and neglect international obligations.

    The new law introduces severe penalties for various offenses: treason carries a life sentence, while damaging public infrastructure with the intent to endanger national security could lead to 20 years or life imprisonment. Sedition is punishable by a seven-year jail term, but collaborating with external forces for such acts increases the penalty to 10 years. The definition of external forces encompasses foreign governments, political parties, international organizations, and any other group abroad pursuing political goals.

    Possession of publications deemed seditious could result in up to three years in prison, and the law grants law enforcement authorities the power to search, seize, and destroy such materials. Additionally, under the proposed law, access to legal counsel may be restricted in situations deemed to endanger national security.

    The draft bill includes provisions asserting the protection and respect for human rights, including freedoms of speech, press, publication, and association. Andrew Leung, the legislature’s president, defends the accelerated process, citing the imperative to safeguard the city’s national security.

    Hong Kong leader John Lee has urged lawmakers to swiftly pass the “Safeguarding National Security Bill”, emphasizing the urgency of the matter. Backed by the majority of Beijing-supported legislators, the bill is expected to be approved and implemented before mid-april, according to official statements. Citing the increasingly complex geopolitics and ongoing national security risks, the government underscores the necessity of prompt action.

    Lawmakers have voiced concerns regarding the potential impact of the broad definition of “External Interference” outlined in Hong Kong’s draft domestic security law. They fear it could hinder regular academic exchanges and business transactions, particularly since officials indicated that collaborating with a foreign organization could be construed as aligning with an “External Force”. However, the city’s security minister moved swiftly to allay these concerns, suggesting that only individuals with intentions to interfere in affairs and employing improper means would be held accountable.

    These discussions unfolded as lawmakers continued to scrutinize the Safeguarding National Security Bill, thoroughly examining at least 73 out of the proposed legislation’s 181 clauses over three consecutive days of meetings. The exhaustive vetting process is anticipated to extend until Monday evening, prompting the Legislative Council’s welfare panel to reschedule a meeting to afford lawmakers on the bills committee additional time for deliberation.

    Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary David Cameron and EU members have called on Hong Kong to reconsider the proposed law. They express concerns over the broad provisions related to “External Interference” and the law’s potential extraterritorial reach, urging a reevaluation of its implications.

    Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, mandates the enactment of a national security law, although a previous attempt in 2003 was abandoned due to public backlash and widespread protests. During a one-month public comment period that concluded last week, the government reported overwhelming support for the proposed legislation, with 98.6% of responses in favor and only 0.7% in opposition.

    The implementation of laws granting broad authority to the administration to handle individuals with differing political views has raised concerns about the potential suppression of dissent similar to the protests seen in 2019-20. Many media outlets and organizations have already aligned themselves with Chinese standards, accepting the government’s narrative.

    While some organizations have raised questions about these developments, the government has swiftly rebuffed criticisms. Organizations like the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation have been labeled as “Anti-China”, with warnings that their calls for sanctions from the US could potentially violate the Beijing-imposed national security law.

    Indeed, this marks the official end of Hong Kong’s era of freedom. Hong Kong finds itself ensnared in a struggle to maintain its identity against the encroaching influence of Chinese culture. With a rich history of British rule and a tradition of openness to global influences, Hong Kong developed a unique identity. However, when pressured to embrace a Chinese identity in recent years, tensions emerged. Presently, the Chinese government is resolute in its efforts to forcibly assimilate Hong Kong into the broader Chinese identity. Consequently, Hong Kong is transitioning into just another Chinese cityscape.

  • Will Chinese Economy Slowdown Affect the “Science War” With the United States?

    Will Chinese Economy Slowdown Affect the “Science War” With the United States?

    The perpetual struggle for supremacy among nations often culminates in tragic and devastating conflicts. However, in the realm of science, this rivalry proves beneficial, as the nation at the forefront of innovation typically emerges as a global leader. This dynamic prompts governments to allocate substantial resources for research and development.

    Throughout history, the competitive landscape of science has propelled progress.. Nazi Germany’s advancements in aircraft research, for instance, spurred the United States to enhance its own aircraft technologies. Similarly, the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union fueled significant progress in space science, consequently advancing capabilities in various fields such as agriculture and medicine.

    After the dissolution of the USSR, a period of stagnation gripped innovation, lacking the competitive impetus that had driven progress. However, the rise of China as a formidable force in the early 21st century, particularly excelling in technology, artificial intelligence, and space exploration bring back good days for science. China’s ambitious pursuits compelled the United States to readjust its research focus, breaking free from years of relative stagnation.

    However, there are indications that the Chinese economy might be faltering. This situation makes one wonder what impact it might have on the pace of technological development and what shape future global innovation will take. 

    While Chinese leaders address the economic challenges, they are not putting their feet back in embracing the technology. China’s policy decisions are channeled through the Chinese National Assembly, colloquially referred to as the “Two Sessions.” Last week’s deliberations during the “Two Sessions” are expected to yield additional policies aimed at bolstering science and technology, forming a pivotal component of a broader strategy to enhance economic growth. As the legislative and top political advisory bodies convene, a fervent discussion ensues concerning China’s technological development and the potential threat posed by the “Middle-technology Trap.”

    The “Middle-technology Trap” involves the peril of developing nations initially benefiting from the transfer of industrial capabilities but encountering prolonged stagnation in catching up with technologically advanced nations, sparking a spirited debate. China’s pursuit of high-quality economic development is intricately linked with technological advancements. While some argue that the substantial gap between China’s technological capabilities and the West fuels the discourse, opposing views question the accuracy of the middle-technology trap concept in portraying China’s current status. This skepticism arises from instances where China has surpassed the United States in certain technological aspects.

    The ongoing discussions reflect China’s nuanced approach to navigating the challenges and opportunities in its technological journey. China aims for a delicate balance between self-reliance and global collaboration to propel its development, showcasing a strategic and multifaceted perspective on the evolving landscape of technology and its role in the nation’s progress.

    China’s standout technological achievement is in the realm of electric vehicles (EV). Chinese outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI) in the EV value chain has experienced significant growth, and Chinese companies’ expects  dominance in high-tech industries expanding overseas. 

    The surge in Chinese EV investments abroad can be attributed to a combination of “Pull” factors abroad and “Push” factors within the Chinese market. International car manufacturers in Europe and the US prefer proximity between battery makers and their plants to mitigate supply chain disruptions and reduce transportation costs. Chinese battery manufacturers, possessing the necessary technology and capital, are well-positioned to meet this demand. Simultaneously, the deceleration and increasing saturation of China’s domestic EV market serve as additional incentives for Chinese EV companies to explore overseas opportunities. With a concurrent rise in global EV adoption, leading Chinese EV companies, spanning raw material refiners, battery material producers, battery manufacturers, and EV producers, are actively targeting international markets.

    Notably, BYD stands out as the world’s largest EV car producer, continually advancing technologies, vehicles, and batteries within China’s robust research centers. The reliance on subsidies and support from the Chinese government is evident, providing a crucial boost for Chinese companies in research and development. When the Chinese economy undergoes a slowdown, there is a growing need for more market-driven funding, potentially impacting business operations. 

    China has emerged as a global leader in the development and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI). Whether in e-commerce, ride-hailing services, or autonomous vehicles, Chinese companies operating in these sectors are formidable global competitors, significantly contributing to China’s overall progress. Chinese policymakers have implemented a comprehensive set of regulations focused on data and consumer protection. These regulations aim to ensure the responsible use of technologies and prevent market abuses by dominant players. China’s regulatory framework, in terms of scope and breadth, currently outpaces that of leading counterparts in Europe and the United States. 

    When we are talking about data security we have to consider the government level data breaching too. The alignment of interests between autocratic governments and AI technology is notable. Autocratic rulers seek the ability to predict the whereabouts, thoughts, and behaviors of citizens – a fundamental aspect of AI technology. This shared purpose creates a synergy between AI technology and autocratic governance. Given the significant data dependence of AI, regimes with authoritarian tendencies, known for extensive data collection, hold a distinct advantage. Companies with Chinese government contracts can leverage state data to enhance commercial projects.

    China is poised to intensify research and development in advanced space technology, with potential implications for the country’s economy and national security. Scheduled for 2024, China’s lunar mission aims to retrieve the first-ever samples from the moon’s far side. Additionally, plans include sending Chinese astronauts to the moon by 2030 and establishing an international lunar research station. China has made remarkable strides in its space endeavors, achieving notable success in key programs such as the independently-run manned space station Tiangong, the Beidou Navigation Satellite System, and lunar and Mars exploration initiatives. And it provoked the US to reinvigorate their space missions. 

    China aims to explore outer space to expand humanity’s understanding of Earth and the cosmos. Simultaneously, the program seeks to foster global consensus on responsibly utilizing outer space for peaceful purposes and ensuring its security for the benefit of humanity. Additionally, the mission includes meeting the demands of economic, scientific, and technological development, national security, and social progress. 

    China’s major achievements in space science include the successful operation of the Beidou Navigation Satellite System, the high-resolution earth observation system, advancements in satellite communications and broadcasting, the completion of the lunar exploration program, and the establishment of China’s own space station. Notably, the Tianwen-1 Mars probe and the Zhurong Mars rover have marked China’s entry into interplanetary exploration.

    Looking ahead, China aims to integrate space science, technology, and applications to support the new development philosophy and meet high-quality development requirements. Initiatives include upgrading Long March carrier rockets for non-toxic and pollution-free launches, deploying smarter modular technology, and introducing new-generation manned carrier rockets and high-thrust solid-fuel carrier rockets.

    Preparations for the Chang’e-6 lunar mission are progressing smoothly, with plans for a relay satellite deployment in early 2024. The Chang’e-8 mission in 2028 invites global collaboration for unmanned lunar expeditions, emphasizing cooperation in spacecraft launch, orbit operation, spacecraft-to-spacecraft interactions, and lunar surface exploration. The mission aims to gather valuable data for the construction of a permanent international research station on the lunar south pole by 2040, aligning with China’s broader ambition to become a major space power.

    Despite China’s rapid economic growth driven by technological advancements borrowed from developed economies and Russia, lingering concerns persist. It is clear that fostering innovation, optimizing incentive structures, and refining review systems are critical for maintaining this growth. Even in sectors where China holds a leading position, such as electric vehicles, the reliance on foreign technology underscores potential gaps in achieving complete self-sufficiency. But, it’s clear, China acknowledges the pivotal role of science and technology in its growth trajectory and is unwavering in its commitment to ensuring their sustained development. Prognostications indicate that China’s future growth in high technology will involve a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, biotechnology, green technology, internet, robots, artificial intelligence, and material science. Certain analysts contend that the present-day anxiety surrounding China’s artificial intelligence breakthroughs is reminiscent of earlier concerns regarding Soviet technology developments. They propose that these concerns might potentially propel technological growth in the United States by fostering the creation of increasingly sophisticated technologies.

  • Russia’s Presidential Election: Putin is Ready for his “First Term”

    Russia’s Presidential Election: Putin is Ready for his “First Term”

    While influential opposition leaders are either being murdered, jailed, or barred, Russia is preparing for its upcoming presidential election in the coming weeks. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has carefully crafted constitutional modifications to prolong his term in office, looks set to win his fifth election. As for the 2020 constitutional amendment, which essentially “Nullified” his prior tenure, he is officially running for another term, but the March 15–17 election will be his first under the new structure. Thanks to this clever political maneuvering, Putin is able to seize several openings, leaving his opponents with no choice but to surrender or risk certain death. The most recent victim was Alexei Navalny, who was barred from future participation in democratic elections in Russia. 

    In December, during a staged event in an opulently furnished Kremlin ballroom, Putin declared his candidacy while speaking with a separatist “Colonel” from the Donbas region of southeast Ukraine. He has four terms under his belt. In 2000, he won the presidency, and he was reelected in 2004, 2012, and 2018. Due to the constitution, he was not elected president during a brief tenure in between; instead, he served as prime minister and also “Super President”. As anticipated, he will serve a further six years if he prevails, as the term has been extended by constitutional revisions. His fifth term would begin with this. After that, he is eligible for a sixth term  in 2030. 

    Since Joseph Stalin, the Soviet leader, the 71-year-old former KGB spy has already led Russia for the longest period of time. Putin’s increasingly harsh handling of opponents, critics, and antiwar demonstrators has drawn comparisons to Stalin’s “Big Terror” operations. To those who support the Kremlin, however, Putin is seen as a political “Genius” who stopped Russia from collapsing, brought billionaire oligarchs under control, and defeated Chechen insurgents. In addition, Putin’s admirers refer to him as a “Gatherer of Russian Lands,” a dignified moniker bestowed upon Russian princes and czars, for his actions in the 2008 war against Georgia, the recognition of two breakaway Georgian statelets, the annexation of Crimea in 2014, and his intentions to annexe full of Ukraine. 

    Putin’s most vocal political rival, Alexey Navalny, passed away in an Arctic prison on February 16 in what his family, followers, and a large portion of the international community considered to be political murder. In the 2018 presidential election, which Putin won with about 78% of the vote, Navalny was not allowed to register. Further opposition activists, Ilya Yashin and Vladimir Kaza-Murza, have been sentenced to eight and a half years and twenty-five years in prison, respectively, for their criticism of Putin’s war in Ukraine. Numerous opposition activists, critics, and normal Russian citizens who shared or liked antiwar comments on the internet have also been charged with crimes in thousands of cases. Tens of thousands have been detained, fined, or expelled from the nation. Russian Democracy is defined here. 

    This is the first three-day voting in Russian history as opposed to the usual one-day one. Additionally, this marks the debut of internet voting for voters in 29 locations. In Russia, 112 million people who are at least 18 years old are able to cast votes. Voting will also take place in occupied Crimea and other parts of Ukraine, a move that Kiev and its Western supporters have denounced as illegal. Millions of Russian citizens residing overseas, from California in the United States to the southern Kazakhstan spaceport of Baikonur, which Russia leases, are also able to cast ballots via mail, consulates, or embassies.  The initial results are anticipated to be made public on March 19 and the final result on March 29. According to official estimates, the officially-expected turnout is almost as high as it was during the 2018 election, when about 68 percent of Russians cast ballots. 

    There’s hardly much optimism for a free and fair vote among those who follow Russian politics. Due to the widespread perception of the current United Russia party as corrupt and ineffective, Putin is contesting as an independent. It was referred to as the “Party of Crooks and Thieves” by late opposition leader Navalny. Other contenders are viewed as symbolic figures whose involvement serves mainly to demonstrate Putin’s “Popularity.” The Communist Party’s Nikolay Kharitonov is one among them. 

    Boris Borisovich Nadezhdin is an opposition politician who has openly condemned the war in Ukraine, said he will designate unbiased observers to supervise elections, and promised to keep appealing the rulings of the Supreme Court against him. But he’s not going to be able to run at all. Sometimes he will also in his final time.

    Nobody is expecting a different result from this election; Putin is viewed as a strong leader, and he is successful in portraying this image. Additionally, his admirers claim that the Russian Federation would fall apart and pandemonium will envelop the country in his absence. The Russian nationalists are therefore standing firm beside him. His drives for “Slavic Unity” and “Russia First”. However, many disbelieve the percentage of vote he gained in elections. The unnatural death of opponents increased screening of opposing candidates, videos of election employees making dubious actions in the booth, a lot of suspicious activity raised doubts in his win. Putin, however, will still receive more than 60% of the vote in the current scenario, and all of the leaders hail him as Russia’s savior. And he will continue to be the ruler. Russia presents new conceptions of democracy that any rulers craving power can embrace.

  • Asia’s Korean Love: How will Korean Soft Power Influence the Region?

    Asia’s Korean Love: How will Korean Soft Power Influence the Region?

    Several months ago, a cohort of young girls mysteriously disappeared from their homes in India, sparking a widespread search by local authorities. Subsequent investigations led the police to locate the missing girls, revealing a captivating story behind their departure. The reason for their unexpected journey garnered significant attention as it unfolded in the media—a tale infused with the fervor of dedicated BTS fans determined to catch a glimpse of their idols at any cost.

    This unique incident unfolded in India, a country known for its historical reluctance to embrace foreign cultural phenomena, including those from the United States. The episode serves as just one example within a vast tapestry of occurrences illustrating the profound impact of South Korean culture and celebrities on a global scale. Whether through the infectious rhythms of K-pop, the allure of K-beauty, or the influence of South Korean cinema and fashion, this East Asian nation has consistently punched above its weight in shaping international trends.

    Exemplifying this cultural influence is the phenomenal success of the “Gangnam” Star PSY,  boyband BTS, and girl band “ Blackpink”  which annually rakes in billions. The group’s popularity transcends borders, reaching far beyond South Korea’s shores. Particularly noteworthy is the distinct appeal BTS holds for Asian audiences, leading individuals from diverse nations such as Pakistan, Japan, Mongolia, and Indonesia to adopt Korean cultural standards as their own.

    This phenomenon signifies a notable departure from traditional style benchmarks, with Asian communities increasingly finding resonance in South Korean cultural norms. As a result, the reach and impact of South Korea’s cultural exports continue to extend across the globe, leaving an indelible mark on societies far and wide.

    Korea Now possesses a formidable superpower—its soft power. In the aftermath of World War II, the United States effectively wielded this soft power in the era of the internet and information, establishing itself as a global influencer. Setting standards in music, fashion, and cinema, the U.S. crafted a narrative that painted its citizens as the epitome of excellence, often leaving African, Asian, and even Eastern European perspectives feeling marginalized.

    However, with the advent of the smartphone era, the pre-established U.S. standards encountered challenges as they failed to authentically represent Asia and Asians. Industries across Asia, from Indian cinema to China, Japan, and the Philippines, struggled to break free from the Eurocentric beauty standards perpetuated by the West. Despite the universal appeal sought in content creation, a void remained, leaving the door open for Korea to emerge victorious in recent decades.

    K-pop consistently dominates Asian charts, and years after the immense success of “Squid Game” and Bong’s groundbreaking “Parasite,” the Korean content juggernaut continues to surge forward. With K-pop girl group Twice claiming the top spot on the U.S. album chart, South Korea’s cultural influence shows no signs of waning. And the movies of Ma-Dong Seok made him the  new super star in the region.

    Western studios are currently in the midst of what can be described as a Korean “Gold rush” Netflix, in a significant move, disclosed a staggering $2.5 billion investment in South Korea projects over the next four years, spearheaded by the announcement of a second season of the immensely popular Squid Game. Not to be left behind, Disney and Apple TV+ are also actively seeking a share of the Korean content market, commissioning additional South Korean shows. 

    Even the venerable BBC has joined the fray. In February, CBBC and BBC iPlayer introduced the Gangnam Project, a coming-of-age “dramedy” delving into the journey of becoming a K-pop superstar. 

    For emerging markets like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Indonesia, a fervor for Korean content is sweeping across the population, reshaping the entertainment landscape and defining the future. Unlike content from the United States, which struggles to make significant inroads in these countries, Korean movies, series, music, and fashion wield considerable influence. This impact is most pronounced among teenagers, youngsters, and smartphone users who transcend conventional religious and cultural boundaries. In the last decade, Merchants note a distinct preference for Korean influencers and products among this demographic, with a notable demand for products endorsed by Korean figures.

    This trend signifies a continued shift among the youth away from conventional movies and music in these regions. While the United States initiated this cultural movement, resistance from older generations curtailed its spread. Interestingly, Korea has avoided such opposition, with elders displaying a more receptive attitude.

    Beyond the Indian subcontinent, countries like China, Japan, the Philippines, and Vietnam are also experiencing a profound impact from Korean content. Inspired by the success of Korean storytelling, these nations are now exploring and globalizing their own content to align with the Korean narrative. Observing the convergence of these cultural trends, it becomes evident that it presents a unique opportunity for content creators and industries alike.

    The expansive reach of the K-genre has evolved beyond the traditional domains of pop music, TV, and film, now encompassing newer realms such as beauty, fashion, cuisine, and literature.

    This global cultural output has proven to be a lucrative asset for what is now Asia’s fifth-largest economy. In 2021, exports of South Korean cultural content soared to a remarkable $12.4 billion, surpassing earnings from domestic electronic appliances and electric vehicles. A 2019 study by the Hyundai Research Institute estimated that BTS alone contributed approximately $3.67 billion annually to the South Korean economy through exports, consumption, and inbound tourism. The impact is exemplified by the success of the band’s single “Dynamite,” reaching No. 1 in the US in 2020 and believed to have generated almost 8,000 jobs. The government actively supports and promotes this flourishing industry, recognizing its economic significance.

    Despite the predominantly positive portrayal of Korea in its cultural exports, artists also delve into the darker aspects of Korean life, addressing issues such as mental health, sexual assault, and exploitation, particularly of women. Numerous films shed light on the complexities of South Korean society, raising important questions. Instances of K-pop stars secretly filming intimate encounters without consent have exposed South Korea’s “Molka” spycam epidemic, revealing broader issues of misogyny within the entertainment sector. The government actively engages with these challenges, acknowledging the need to address such issues and foster a healthier environment for artists amidst challenging circumstances.

    The most triumphant figures in K-pop have traditionally presented variations of the same song in diverse languages to cater to specific target markets. This strategy notably propelled Jungkook of BTS to the pinnacle of both the US Billboard Hot 100 and the UK singles chart last year with his debut solo single, “Seven.” In a noteworthy evolution, multilingual performers now share the stage with K-pop bands originating outside Korea. For instance, the colossal Korean boyband NCT has expanded to include sub-branches like NCT Wish, featuring six Japanese members, and WayV, whose members hail from China and Thailand. And Blackpink has Aria from India. Additionally, Vcha, an American girl group based in Los Angeles, adds to the global diversity within the genre.

    As linked with popularity for K-lifestyle, a surge in international interest has emerged in learning the Korean language. Universities , Schools, and Language clubs in Asia and the US saw a rise of Korean language demand. Korean is more demanded than Chinese, Japanese among youngsters in Indian language clubs even though the business and job opportunities that language provides.

    South Korea became the  modern center of the creative world. This influence of a cultural superpower  is not a recent development; even in ancient times, states with rich  literature, philosophies, arts, and books held sway. Greece, Persia, India, France, England, to name a few, all harnessed soft power to exert influence. The reverence for cultural superpowers endures, with the United States standing as a prime example. Through movies, music, fashion, and various cultural exports, the United States has established itself as a dominant force globally, overshadowing counterparts from Britain, France, Italy, and Russia. With the 21st century, a new player is in the stage, South Korea is definitely getting an upper hand in the cultural superpower. And Asia which does not cooperate with anything besides the business is getting closely bound with this Korean entertainment business.